The graph compares employment rates in three sectors of the economy, in the UK, 2000-2010.
The line graph illustrates data about the number of employers in three economic sectors in the UK, over a decade between 2000 and 2010.
Overall, what stands out from the graph are that there were significant upward trends in the employment rates of both self-employed and public sector, while the working people of private sector witnessed a substantial fall over the period in question. Another interesting point is that the private sector was the most popular in 2000; however, in 2010, the public sector was employed more workers than the others.
Looking at the details, as regards public sector, income began at just under 40 persons in 2000, at which point it levelled off at the same number until 2002. Following this, the employment rate increased significantly by around 10 persons from nearly 38 people (2002) to approximately 48 people (2006). Next, despite falling slightly to just around employers in 2006, the figure then saw a gradual rise to just above 50 workers at the end of the decade. If we look at self-employment, the trend was similar. It started at below 20 people in 2000, this was followed by a slight increase to 20 employers in 2002. Having declined negligibly at around 18 persons in 2003, employers then rose substantially to nearly 30 in 2010.
By contrast, the rate of employment of private sector went in the opposite direction. It was decreased dramatically by around 30 persons, from 50 employers in 2000 to 20 employers in 2010.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-09-05 | harshiniharshini | 84 | view |
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The graph compares employment rates in three sectors of the economy, in the UK, 2000-2010. 84
- Pie chart shows the percentage of the government money spent on various sectors as well as production from each of those sectors. 78
- Some people think that having a set retirement age 65 years for everybody regardless of occupation is unfair They believe that certain workers deserve to retire and receive a pension at an early age 92
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, then, while, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 33.7804878049 172% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1230.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 248.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95967741935 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74658050574 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564516129032 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 345.6 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2896649855 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.818181818 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5454545455 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332322331317 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140912525628 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106859573895 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267453314095 0.15604864568 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.098614695869 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.