The chart below shows the percentage of the whole world population in four countries from 1950-2002,with projections to 2050.
The bar chart indicates the ratio of the world population in India, China, USA and Japan from 1950 to 2002. It also give a prediction of percentage of all in 2050. And it seems the population of India keeps increase while the population of China keeps decrease, Japan has same trend.
From the graph, the proportion of population of China ranked the first both in 1950 and 2002. However, it actually keeps decrease, dropped down slightly from 26%(1950) to 24%(2002). It is predicted that the population will continue to decrease to 19% in 2050. The population of Japan has familiar trend, which started at only 5% in 1950 and will end at around 3% in 2050. Besides, the population of India places the second one of four, and it increased from 15% in 1950 to 19% in 2002. And in prediction, it will come in the first place after 50 years, with scale of 21%. The number of people in USA occupied 10% in 1950, fell to 7% in 2002, and will stay same in 2050.
- The chart below shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 73
- Some people believe everyone has the right to get university education To what extent do you agree government should make it free to all people no matter of their financial background 50
- The table below provides information on rental charges and salaries in three areas of London.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 61
- People attend colleges or universities for many different reasons (for example, new experiences, career preparation, increased knowledge etc.). Why do you think people attend colleges or universities? 61
- In the modern age, some people think it is unnecessary to teach children the skill of handwriting. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'gives'?
Suggestion: gives
...SA and Japan from 1950 to 2002. It also give a prediction of percentage of all in 20...
^^^^
Line 1, column 278, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'trended'.
Suggestion: trended
...of China keeps decrease, Japan has same trend. From the graph, the proportion of p...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, first, however, second, so, while, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 780.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.43181818182 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37668491777 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511363636364 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 216.9 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.6171963518 43.030603864 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.0 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341058288463 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139856887094 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677350762734 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268014064824 0.15604864568 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021286464779 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 13.2329268293 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 88.06 61.2550243902 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.12 11.4140731707 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.