Unfortunately, the media tend to highlight what is sensational at the moment. Society would
be better served if the media reported or focused more fully on events and trends that will
ultimately have the most long-term significance.
The media comes front with the prevailing events around the society is supposed, and if it does so a society would be better served in that way. The speaker states the same scenario in the above assertion, and I partly support that assertion.
Indisputably, media has been a form of gaining information about the happenings all through the world. So, media should focus on pervasive and effective events, and not so-called sensational events. If media only stress on the so-called sensational events, we, people hardly get to be informed of the criteria surrounding us, and we would tend to take decision about an event parochially. Nevertheless, a person inherently relies on skepticism, and prone to judge a scenario evaluating all the presentation related to that scenario. But, if media comes with just a partly information, a person would fail to satiate his/her skepticism, and as a result, he/she will offer a decision relying on the fraction of an event. Besides, information related to a certain event often got falsely fabricated by the media, and people are the only victim of that judging an event in a narrow sense.
Moreover, ‘sensational’ word varies from person to person. Media focusing on a particular so-called sensational news might not give any sensation to a particular group of people. For an instance, media is broadcasting live from an event where celebrities gather to observe a function. This particular function could be sensational to some people by means but other don’t find any kind of value of it. In this case, that function doesn’t hold any sensationalism rather can bring tiresome to a group of people. Nevertheless, the media forcing people to swallow that ironic even thoroughly. That’s not justifiable by any means.
Aside to the forgoing reason, focusing on the sensationalism can be supported in specific cases. And, that cases can be exorbitant of events and enormous jobs that must be performed by people. In first case, this very world is inundated with events, and those events are taking part in every corner of this colossal world. The media sometimes find it impossible to focus on every single events whether it noteworthy or not. And in the second case, by the development of technology, people have much more tasks to do in a single day. besides, their typical working time has also outnumbered the earlier time frame. People get very short period of moments to share with their loved ones, kin and so forth. In this very short period, they merely have enough time to squander on the very single event that are occurring through the world. That’s why, a person only tend to satiate his/her curious instinct only by the highlights of the sensational events.
In conclusion, this world or the society need to balanced through every sort of thing, otherwise chaos will break out, and if the media doesn’t play it’s role accurately, society will barely be served by the media’s performance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-07 | hossainmehrub | 62 | view |
- Unfortunately, the media tend to highlight what is sensational at the moment. Society wouldbe better served if the media reported or focused more fully on events and trends that willultimately have the most long-term significance. 50
- Students should memorize facts only after they have studied the ideas, trends, and conceptsthat help explain those facts. Students who have learned only facts have learned very little. 50
- Unfortunately, the media tend to highlight what is sensational at the moment. Society wouldbe better served if the media reported or focused more fully on events and trends that willultimately have the most long-term significance. 58
- "In any realm of life---whether academic, social, business, or political---the only way to succeed is to take a practical, rather than an idealistic, point of view. Pragmatic behavior guarantees survival, whereas idealistic views tend to be superseded by 83
- Unfortunately, the media tend to highlight what is sensational at the moment. Society wouldbe better served if the media reported or focused more fully on events and trends that willultimately have the most long-term significance. 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 564, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('partly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('information') instead of another adjective.
...scenario. But, if media comes with just a partly information, a person would fail to satiate his/her...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 534, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Besides
... much more tasks to do in a single day. besides, their typical working time has also ou...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, in conclusion, kind of, sort of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2516.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 490.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13469387755 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70488508055 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95057791585 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502040816327 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 788.4 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 10.0 1.77640449438 563% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0120744549 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.64 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.83258426966 248% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220985930592 0.243740707755 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619206009827 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499340068542 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129081673609 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0161717306198 0.0667264976115 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.