In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Human beings are thirsty for knowledge. Our never-ending quest for quenching this thirst has led us to the discovery and invention of endless ideas, theories, technologies and much more of the like. This thirst of curiosity has given rise to many fields and in itself with the passage of time has institutionalized an educational and professional system of classification. The wiser and experienced like to classify themselves as experts where as the naive and callow are referred to as beginners. It has been indoctrinated in these taxonomic systems that beginners are likely to contribute lesser to the field itself than the experts. The validity of this statement holds with respect to day-to-day logic but the world presents us with exceptions from time to time, and it can often be the case that beginners end up making enormous contributions that drive contemporary advancements. In my opinion, the statement holds true but isn’t necessarily valid from all perspectives.
In any field, be it technology, science or philosophy, experts are recognized as people who have spent substantial amounts of time studying the field, understanding its inner workings and rudiments, and applying them in day-to-day lives to come up with newer and apposite ideas that benefit mankind. Beginners, however, have either recently started studying the field, or have recently started working in the field. This leads us directly to the logic of experience. An experienced person is bound to know better what the field lacks, how it can be improved and what sort of ideas can be implemented to tackle these problems. For example, in a corporate setting the general manager who has worked his way up the corporate ladder over the past 20 years definitely has more experience in the market and knows what the shortcomings of the market are. He is bound to make more important contributions to the company, overall, compared to the new intern. The intern might face more problems initially, and it might seem that these problems could lead to contributions, but the problem the beginner faces is generally due to the lack of knowledge and experience rather than an abundance of it.
An expert, in addition to being experienced, is more knowledgeable. He knows the inner mysteries of the field, and his eagerness to demystify them can be satiated easily because of the prepossessed knowledge. For instance, Einstein’s theory of relativity, can be seemingly confounding to a lot of people, but many of the science students study the equation and it’s background very early in their educational path, atleast by the tenth or eleventh grade. But how many of them can actually make a connection between the special theory of relativity and time travel? I would argue, only a few, maybe! On the contrary, theoretical physicists have taken these pre-existing theories and turned them wonderfully into different concepts ranging from time travel, to refuting time travel, to big bang and string theory. It is because of this knowledge that the experienced often possess, that propel them to make better, relevant , novel and more important contributions.
However, we cannot entirely discount the possibility that beginners can make important contributions in a field. A beginner, being the naive soul they are, are more inquisitive and curious, because most of them cannot fathom the boundaries of the field. This makes it possible for them to ask interesting philosophical questions pertaining to the field which can often lead to important contributions in the future. In the case of Michael Faraday, who established the famous laws of electromagnetic induction, we can see that Faraday was not a member of the group of noble physicists. Yet, with hardwork, he gained knowledge and contributed his theories which make up one of the most important ideas in physics.
This leads us to being able to aptly conclude that although beginners might make important contributions to a field, it is definitely more likely for an expert to do so, because of their vast knowledge and experience in the subject or field.
- Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your 66
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. I 66
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 66
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supp 66
- Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 439, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
... like to classify themselves as experts where as the naive and callow are referred to as...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 932, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...hat propel them to make better, relevant , novel and more important contributions....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, may, so, for example, for instance, in addition, sort of, in my opinion, on the contrary, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 32.0 14.8657303371 215% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 33.0505617978 182% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 94.0 58.6224719101 160% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3457.0 2235.4752809 155% => OK
No of words: 664.0 442.535393258 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2063253012 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.07623851424 4.55969084622 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05105926395 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 325.0 215.323595506 151% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489457831325 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 1075.5 704.065955056 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 6.24550561798 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.1310336337 60.3974514979 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.961538462 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5384615385 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11538461538 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183119692577 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055989246222 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409118063133 0.0758088955206 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11948138537 0.150359130593 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335744321183 0.0667264976115 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 171.0 100.480337079 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.