Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
It is in the philosophy of nature, to assert that whatever comes has to go. Modern advances in science, technology, archaeology and paleontology have equipped humans with the knowledge of the various kinds of life forms that existed even before the evolution of humans. If we look at such a timeline that delineates the origin and extinction of a wide variety of species, it might be natural to think that extinction is essentially an unstoppable fate that every species needs to meet. Yet, again, if we nearly estimate the amount of time that certain species have lived and compare them to the amount of time that we human beings have survived on this planet, the staggering difference in those numbers would clearly indicate a competitive edge that humans have over the various other species that have inhabited the earth before humans. A major area of concern for many biologists and wildlife enthusiasts has been regarding the extinction of certain species and their endangerment. Endless debates go on to take a side on what role society has to play in the preservation of such species, and I would be of the opinion that society has a protective duty for its dying neighbors.
To start with, let us first understand that nature is an extremely complex system that demands everything to be balanced for its sustenance. There are even complex subsystems that we study about in the environmental sciences, things like, food chains, food webs, ecosystems, and biospheres. For each of these systems to perpetuate through time in an orderly fashion a balance and diversity in the number and type of organisms is required. Endangered species pose a direct threat on such systems and subsystems. For example, the population of tigers has drooped drastically over the years, and some areas in the world have already declared them endangered. We might think of it as just a classification until we analyse the underlying consequences of such endangerment. In the food chain, tigers lie above goats which generally lie above grass. If the amount of tigers decreases, the population of goats increase, since there are lesser tigers to eat the goats, and an increased number of goats would generally mean that the amount of grass is going to decrease. This imbalance in the food chain sets into motion a tremendous chaos in nature. These consequences directly or indirectly impact human beings, and as inhabitants of nature, it becomes our inherent duty to protect it. For example, if the amount of grass decreases, we can clearly see that the carbon cycle and consequently the level of pollution goes into a state of disorder.
As important as it is, to ensure the safety of these endangered species due to the kind of imbalance that their extinction can set into motion, it is equally important to understand that as the most intellectual, moral beings on the planet, who have unravelled various mysteries of science and have set in stone a variety of moral notions, it is our duty to also abide by them. We have often established a principle of emotions and feelings for others, when they are vulnerable. In the social sciences, this might be regarded as emotional awareness. It is our responsibility to enact these principles irrespective of who is on the receiving end. Saving the lives of endangered species, spreads a message of positivity and unites people of different backgrounds to work towards a common goal, which in turn promotes fraternity, and peace. We have also established principles whereby we despise the selfish. So why should we be selfish, especially when it comes to the matter of life and death, of not just a single organism, but a whole array of species.
Many might argue for us to be indifferent to problems which do not affect us, or our race. In strong condemnation of their viewpoint, it is important to understand that many a times, what might seem not to have a direct causal relationship, might belie indirect consequences which can be grave for the entirety of mankind. World balance can only be established and maintained if the entire society works towards protecting nature and its inhabitants selflessly, more so, because we possess the knowledge to astutely solve these critical problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | Himanshu Sharma | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | Manoj Gyawali | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | Manoj Gyawali | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-09 | harshit kukreja | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | Caveira meyona | 62 | view |
- Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 66
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supp 66
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. I 66
- Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your 66
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 345, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an orderly fashion" with adverb for "orderly"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...hese systems to perpetuate through time in an orderly fashion a balance and diversity in the number a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun might seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much might', 'a good deal of might'.
Suggestion: Much might; A good deal of might
...ism, but a whole array of species. Many might argue for us to be indifferent to probl...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 175, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a time' or simply 'times'?
Suggestion: a time; times
...it is important to understand that many a times, what might seem not to have a direct c...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, look, regarding, so, thus, as to, for example, kind of, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 26.0 11.3162921348 230% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 68.0 33.0505617978 206% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 104.0 58.6224719101 177% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3535.0 2235.4752809 158% => OK
No of words: 707.0 442.535393258 160% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.15649799773 4.55969084622 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87120421282 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 338.0 215.323595506 157% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478076379066 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 1130.4 704.065955056 161% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.1252555551 60.3974514979 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.925925926 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1851851852 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123728550958 0.243740707755 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0328735534997 0.0831039109588 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0307348760257 0.0758088955206 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0789697952338 0.150359130593 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326970438288 0.0667264976115 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 168.0 100.480337079 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.