The chart below shows reasons for travel and the main issues for the travelling public in the US in 2009
The charts provide information about causes for travelling and the chief problems for travelers in the US in the year 2009.
A common feature for both charts is one category accounted for a drastically greater figure as travelling for work was the prime motivation while costs troubled travelers the most.
Forefront among the reasons for travelling was commuting to and from work, with nearly half of the US residents stated this as the main cause. At starkly smaller figures, less than 20% of travelers travel for private reasons and 16% for shopping. Only one in ten people travelled for social or recreational purposes, which leaves visiting friends and relatives the least important reason, at only 6%.
Turning to the problems for the travelling public, cost of travel accounted for over one third. Issues such as safe concerns, aggressive drivers and highway congestion were less problematic, taking up proportions from 19% to 14%. Very small percentages of people were troubled by space for pedestrians and access to public transport (at 6% and 8%, respectively).
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should spend about 20 minutes on this task 84
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled The say that the only way to increase recycling is for government to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste W 86
- The Internet has changed the way people information is shared. It has also created certain problems.What are the problems caused by the Internet and their solutions? 89
- What can governments do to encourage children to eat more healthily Write at least 250 words to discuss the topic 58
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at le 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...travelers in the US in the year 2009. A common feature for both charts is one ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, third, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 915.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28901734104 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77075846581 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647398843931 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.3472754946 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.375 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 5.23603664747 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.559439522187 0.215688989381 259% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.258055608303 0.103423049105 250% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136417414539 0.0843802449381 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.362360742056 0.15604864568 232% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0694368521375 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.