Many animal species in the world are becoming extinct nowadays. Some people say that countries and individuals shout protect these animals from dying out, while others say we should concentrate more on problems of human beings l. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
God has divided us with a lot of beautiful things and animals or plants are the significant parts of the vicious cycle. Owing to this, it is debatable that people should protect those creatures who are becoming extinct or focus on human issues. This essay will cast light on both views before making a final note.
To begin with, there are ample reasons why individuals and nations should protect extinct animals. The predominant reason is, they are part of our ecosystem. To be more precise, every species of wildlife plays a vital role to maintain the balance of life on Earth. For instance, there are many bat species that are becoming extinct. Such bats help keep the insects' population in control because if these bats die then the insects will increase a lot and destroy our crops. So, we will have nothing to eat. Thus, the loss of any species can affect us either directly or indirectly. Another reason is, it assists in the field of medicine. Each animal is considered a unique material and scientists can do research on creatures and find many vaccines which is helpful for reducing diseases.
On the contrary, some conservationists argue that people should give more attention to human problems. Initially, in many developing nations, human is still suffering from many issues like poverty, unemployment, famine and so on. What is more, if the government is allocated a proper budget on these problems then many people will not face any dilemma in their life. In addition, the environmental issue has been rising all over the world. So, authorities can give proper concentrate on this concern rather than animals because it has become a worldwide issue nowadays.
To recapitulate, although authorities cannot neglect human problems related to poverty, pollution, so on, according to me, government and individuals both should put their best foot forward together in order to curb endangered species.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-14 | pateldhruv272 | 79 | view |
- The natural resources such as oil forests and fresh water are being consumed at an alarming rate What problems does it cause How can we solve these problems 90
- Today there are a lot of websites providing news on the internet Some people believe that these websites will totally replace traditional newspapers and magazines To what extent do you agree or disagree 80
- It is observed that people these days spend large sums of money on clothes hair care and other beauty products Some people see it is as a necessary expenditure whereas other see it as wastage of money Do you agree or disagree 88
- Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation’s history. Some people think that they should be knocked down and replaced by new ones. How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of progress? Give reasons and 67
- Nowadays many people prefer to shop in supermarket rather than small shops or local markets Is this positive or negative for development Discuss and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 358, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'insects'' or 'insect's'?
Suggestion: insects'; insect's
...coming extinct. Such bats help keep the insects population in control because if these ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, still, then, thus, for instance, in addition, on the contrary, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12341772152 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68702008008 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623417721519 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.6897751751 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.9444444444 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5555555556 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292654445566 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745641055193 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487754767815 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152031996195 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463101113881 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.