Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extend do you agre or disagree?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
Currently traffic and pollution are the most complex problems in all over the world. Although some people claim that with along rising in the price of petrol lots of handicaps will be solved, I disagree.
To begin with, those who support increasing the price of petrol believe that with this action societies will be confronted to decrease of traffic jams and pollution owing to fewer demands. Proponent of an increase in petrol’s price argue that communities benefit from this issue, for example, governments spend the obtained incomes in the education of public sanitation, industry, public transport, so on and so forth.
Nevertheless, there are a lot of reasons indicating aforementioned subject is not practical. As we all are well aware petrol’s price after increment will have a fixed amount for all people whatever rich or poor. Therefore, poor people will be engaged with new problem, as far as I know governments have been constituted in order to remove short comings not creation of another adverse feature. As well as this, history has shown that the rise of prices will not give birth to less use.
There are plenty of measures that can be performed in effective ways to tackle these problems. Firstly, high quality public transport is a beneficial solution which will encourage people to consume less petrol. Secondly, good plan of key buildings such as schools, universities, offices that are located in diverse regions of cities so as to prevent from traffic particularly in rush hours. Finally, further measurements could be widening roads and higher punishments for defective vehicles.
To sum up, I personally believe that increasing the price of petrol is the most bootless way and this solution will not work. Alternative ways should be presented by authorities to make societies without pollution and traffic.
- Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishm 68
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant. 70
- Compare the advantages and disadvantages of three of the following as media for communicating information. State which you consider to be the most effective.comicsbooksradiotelevisionfilmtheatre 70
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extend do you agre or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective? 70
is beneficial solution
is a beneficial solution
to make societies without pollution and traffic.
Description: check books how to use 'without'
such as schools, universities, offices so that are located in diverse regions of cities
such as schools, universities, offices that are located in diverse regions of cities
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 1 4 15
No. of Words: 297 350
No. of Characters: 1501 1500
No. of Different Words: 178 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.151 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.054 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.693 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 113 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 91 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 58 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 39 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.214 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.282 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.714 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.313 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.589 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.043 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5