the percentage of daily consumption of fruits and vegetable by UK people in three different yearsThe graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years.
The line chart represents how much amount of waste was produced by three companies over 15 years from 2000 to 2015.
Overall, company A had the largest amount of waste production in 2000, which was followed by company B and C. When company C slightly raised its waste production in 2005, company A and B slightly reduced over time.
In 2000, company A caused the production of 12 tones waste, but it started constantly reducing over the period and reached 3 tones of waste production in 2015. In contrast, company A steeply increased its waste from 8 tones to 10 tones within five years, however, it sharply reduced to 3 tones between 2005 and 2015. Even though the manufacturing company C had only 3 tones of waste after the production in 2000, which slightly rose 7 tomes within 10 years and, there after from 2010 to 2015 dramatically grew its production to 10 tones withing 5 years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-27 | neethujithin | 73 | view |
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four different seasons.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Should Parents Be Held Legally Responsible For Children’s Act 70
- The violence portrayed on T.V and in the movies leads to an increase in crime in our society. People who watch violent movies are more likely to become criminals. Do you agree or disagree? 77
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four different seasons.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 100
- Should Parents Be Held Legally Responsible For Children’s Act 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 53, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pany A caused the production of 12 tones waste, but it started constantly reducin...
^^
Line 11, column 464, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: thereafter
...ghtly rose 7 tomes within 10 years and, there after from 2010 to 2015 dramatically grew its...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 743.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73248407643 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57413114707 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528662420382 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 207.9 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6204145337 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.833333333 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1666666667 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182986054147 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118366478699 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653583118414 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164637588443 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668854355261 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.