Should governments regulate the fast food industries in the same way that regulates the drug, alcohol and tobacco industries?
In this day and age, there has been heated debate about whether or not authorities should control fast food industries in a similar way that drug, tobacco and alcohol ones are regulated. From my perspective, fast food sector is not that negative to deserve such tough restriction for the reasons below.
To begin with, fast food does not do so much harm to humans as drug, alcohol or tobacco. As a matter of fact, disputes over junk food only mention health problems such as obesity and cardiovascular diseases. Nonetheless, the three regulated substances even take their tolls on both health and social security. To illustrate, there is no injury that one can cause to another person by eating a quick meal, whilst a drug addict can commit serious crime namely robbery, kidnapping or murder with a view to feeding his addiction. In addition, only by a huge intake can junk food be detrimental, which is not the case with alcohol, drug or tobacco, as one glass of wine possibly leads to a severe accident on road.
Another reason for my opposition to the stringent management of fast food restaurants is that they play an vital role in national revenue. Let take Mc Donalds as a prime example. Admittedly, with thousands stores all over the world, it contributes billions dollars to the budget in terms of tax and profit. Furthermore, it is fast food chains that provide ample job opportunity, thus, lessen the amount of money wasting on unemployment issue.
Taking all reasons into account, I believe it will be more beneficial if the government keep the fast food industries under a less strict control than the other sectors including drug, tobacco and alcohol.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-19 | minhdo9966 | 56 | view |
| 2021-10-03 | treewannalearnIE | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-29 | sora_iko | 91 | view |
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as the South Pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 50
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 89
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than on roads.To what extent do you agree/disagree? 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accomodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 78
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 57, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...age, there has been heated debate about whether or not authorities should control fast food in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a similar way" with adverb for "similar"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ies should control fast food industries in a similar way that drug, tobacco and alcohol ones are...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 105, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...fast food restaurants is that they play an vital role in national revenue. Let tak...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, nonetheless, so, thus, in addition, such as, as a matter of fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1391.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91519434629 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68052819982 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65371024735 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5588875312 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.916666667 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5833333333 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41666666667 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341741669668 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101980912071 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0986233487293 0.0667982634062 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195228207088 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0826835263366 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.