The chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used the Internet everyday from 2003 to 2006.
The given chart elucidates the information about the proportion of grown-ups from diverse age categories connecting to the Internet on a daily basis in the UK between 2003 and 2006. As illustrated by the chart, the percentage of adults using the Internet every day witnessed an upward pattern and when people got older, the utilization of the Internet seemed to hold less attraction. Also of note is that the highest figure belonged to the age bracket 16-24 in the year 2005.
It is evident that in the first year, the data for Internet users aged from 16 to 24 stood at 80%, which was roughly twice as high as that of the 45-54 year-olds. Meanwhile, exactly a half of the respondents between 25 and 44 indicated that they made access to the Internet everyday compared with a lower figure for the age group 55-64, at 30%. Another notable feature is that no figure was demonstrated for the participants aged 65+ in 2003.
Looking at more details, the Internet users aged from 25-44 underwent a remarkable rise from 45% to approximately 80% in 2006. There also existed a consistent growth by roughly 20% from 60% in 2003 for the 45-54 year olds. The other age brackets establishing connection to the Internet including 16-24, 55-64 and 65+ generally witnessed slight climbs to approximately 90%, 50% and 20% respectively in 2006 despite some erratic patterns throughout the investigated period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-01 | quynhhtrangg2512 | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-29 | quynhhtrangg2512 | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-29 | quynhhtrangg2512 | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-29 | quynhhtrangg2512 | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used the Internet everyday from 2003 to 2006. 78
- Some people believe that the advent of economical air travel has been very beneficial by making international travel more accessible, while others argue that it has had a very negative impact. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 89
- An increasing number of professionals, such as doctors and teachers, are leaving their own poorer countries to work in developed countries. What problems does this cause? What solutions can you suggest to deal with this situation? 89
- The table below gives information about the use of different modes of transport in Shanghai in 1996, and one possible projection (high motorization scenario) for their use in 2020.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below. 73
- The charts below show the percentage of time younger and older people spend on various Internet activities in their free time (excluding email).Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 386, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...nternet seemed to hold less attraction. Also of note is that the highest figure belo...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... age bracket 16-24 in the year 2005. It is evident that in the first year, th...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 281, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...d that they made access to the Internet everyday compared with a lower figure for the ag...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r the participants aged 65+ in 2003. Looking at more details, the Internet us...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 67, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ails, the Internet users aged from 25-44 underwent a remarkable rise from 45% to ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1164.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93220338983 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78186598676 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 106.607317073 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601694915254 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 341.1 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6333225737 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.333333333 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2222222222 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299685333403 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11786813279 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631780417958 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20425326935 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0666874978362 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.