A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons

Presently, humans are being graded in a society based on the valuable belongings they possess and their social class, whereas, personal traits have become less important, such as honesty, empathy, and trustworthiness. This essay disagrees because traditional values still play a vital role in the community.

Firstly, undeniably, wealthy people become popular more easily than those who have less in their bank accounts and get more media coverage. However, rich will only be appreciated positively, if they do good towards the community, such as doing charity or humanitarian work. A person who owns a huge sum but does not spend on the better cause would project himself as a miser and unkind. Whereas, those who spend a sum from their earnings on public welfare would be treated with respect. For example, Bill Gates is famous for having wealth, but people admire him more for his philanthropist work as he donates money to the needy and misfortunate.

Secondly, moral principles still play a key role in the whole economic and social system. Industries and even small businesses around the world still hire employees based on moral beliefs. Several personality tests tell what kind of thinking a person possesses and no organization would ever appoint an untrustworthy individual. In addition to that, even in the present time, it is unacceptable for the people to be unkind to each other or treat someone as inferior. Not only the government have laws to protect misbehavior, but even the public also stands up based on basic human principles. For example, in many western countries, the racists and impolite words are punishable by Law and the public stands for these rights.

In conclusion, although the societal standards of judgment have changed, however, conventional values are still an integral part of the human civilization and are of significant value.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... project himself as a miser and unkind. Whereas, those who spend a sum from their earni...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, whereas, for example, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21523178808 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8340985903 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635761589404 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9697391048 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.5 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64285714286 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0981851191613 0.244688304435 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0329826649907 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377007904607 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.056573889075 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039147436476 0.056905535591 69% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.