Plowing invention in the agriculture
The lecture criticizes the plow, thus the points in the lecture challenge points in the reading.
First, according to the lecture the plow increases crops,but does not conserve for the future. The professor discussed alternating farming, which is better. This is contrast with the reading that the plow is a great invention because it makes possible vast surface agriculture.
Second, the lecture state the overuse of the plow damage to the soil. For example professor said it causes erosion by the wind and water. In the following of the lecture professor state dust bowl run of the soil into the lake and river happened while the plow are extremely. This challenges the point in the reading that tilling soil with a plow improves the soil. Furthermore, professor in the lecture states that no till farming leaves crops residues on the field, and after a time decomposes completely, consequence this improve the soil. This is contrast with the passage that state plowing incorporates these residues in to the soil. Furthermore plowing loosens and weaken the soil.
Third, the professor mentioned the economic advantage of no till farming. He believed its leads to save fuel and labor costs. However passage state the plow reduces the costs and labor requirements of agriculture.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-10-04 | hosseindehnamaki | 61 | view |
- Exprience acute stress 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Subjects such as art, music, and drama should be a part of every child's basic education.Use specific reasons and example to support your opinion. 78
- Plow in agriculture 60
- Experience accute strss 3
- Satisfying jobs for the workers 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 57, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , but
... to the lecture the plow increases crops,but does not conserve for the future. The p...
^^^^
Line 9, column 640, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...rporates these residues in to the soil. Furthermore plowing loosens and weaken the soil. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 678, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... Furthermore plowing loosens and weaken the soil. Third, the professor ment...
^^
Line 13, column 127, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...its leads to save fuel and labor costs. However passage state the plow reduces the cost...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, second, so, third, thus, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1086.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 209.0 270.72406181 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1961722488 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62712106106 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 145.348785872 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535885167464 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6057575242 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.5714285714 110.228320801 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9285714286 21.698381199 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06452816374 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195405815226 0.272083759551 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759000656984 0.0996497079465 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636883461958 0.0662205650399 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118823384154 0.162205337803 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504551060022 0.0443174109184 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.