Pruning trees
In the lecture professor describes a poor pruning practice known as topping. In the following he mentioned some detriment of the topping that pruning needs to done wisely and believed badly pruned can become disaster. Also in the lecture, professor prove the pruning as benefit ways to grow's rate, thus some points in the lecture challenge points in the reading.
First, he states that topping does not keep a tree small and in contrast with believed of people, pruning lead to speed up the growth rate of trees. Also professor illustrate this issues with example of client's tree that now have the vast branches.
Second, in the lecture professor mentioned topping is a very stressful work for tree because such heavy pruning lead to removes very branches of the tree consequently, the rate of photosynthesis reduce extremely, so leaves as the factories of the trees eliminate and trees may starve. On the contrary, in the passage reading state pruning invigorate tress and keep them healthy.
Third, the lecture stated the topping destroys a tree's natural shapes and it gives weak branches. It contrasts with the point in the reading that pruning should enhance the natural shape and beauty of a tree. Furthermore, in the lecture explain the tree should have had an occasional light pruning instead of butchering trees heavily and this subject have proven in the reading passage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-04 | hosseindehnamaki | 80 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Subjects such as art, music, and drama should be a part of every child's basic education.Use specific reasons and example to support your opinion. 78
- Discovery of antibiotics 91
- Mark test for interpret chimps behaviors 85
- Study of cooperation and conflict between same age groups children 85
- Plowing invention in the agriculture 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...d to speed up the growth rate of trees. Also professor illustrate this issues with e...
^^^^
Line 7, column 195, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...consequently, the rate of photosynthesis reduce extremely, so leaves as the facto...
^^
Line 7, column 278, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ies of the trees eliminate and trees may starve. On the contrary, in the passage ...
^^
Line 11, column 48, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a tree' or simply 'trees'?
Suggestion: a tree; trees
...the lecture stated the topping destroys a trees natural shapes and it gives weak branch...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 261, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., in the lecture explain the tree should have had an occasional light pruning ins...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, may, second, so, third, thus, as to, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 10.4613686534 10% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1170.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 229.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10917030568 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5249239091 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545851528384 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.8713227773 49.2860985944 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06452816374 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.520233025184 0.272083759551 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.211618091261 0.0996497079465 212% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100720512193 0.0662205650399 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.329241347236 0.162205337803 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0866929398486 0.0443174109184 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.