Younger employees have more skills, knowledge and more motivated than older employees. To what extent do you agree or disagree, support your argument with your own experience?
In today’s era, it becomes a controversial topic that younger employees possess more skills, knowledge and higher level of motivation than senior employees. While I do admit that they have more technical skills, in my opinion, their level of knowledge and motivation are more or less on a par with those of senior employees. I will elaborate in the following essay.
To begin with, the main advantage that younger employees have over senior employees is that they are more tech-savvy. Youngsters grew up in the age of technology. They are adept at using all modern gadgets and technologies. Organisations especially those working at the cutting edge of technology require this expertise of young people and hence they give preference to them while recruiting people. For example, in the information technology sector technology becomes outdated pretty fast. They need engineers who are well-versed in the latest programming languages and hardware technologies. Needless to say most people employed in this sector are youngsters.
On the flip side, it is impossible to deny the importance of experienced employees. Knowledge does not necessarily mean only technological knowledge. While young people certainly have an advantage over seniors in matters of technology, it is not possible to say that their knowledge of other aspects of work or life is more. Likewise, the argument that they possess a higher level of self-motivation also sounds frivolous to me. Young people are less serious than seniors about career. Actually, people in their 20’s are more concerned about enjoying their life than making significant contributions to their organisations.
To recapitulate, according to the above points, young people certainly possess more technical skills than old people. However, I do not agree with the argument that the have more knowledge or self-motivation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-31 | Maheswari | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | kathyngo95 | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-25 | hemsingh81 | 80 | view |
| 2019-02-05 | baran.bahrani | 88 | view |
| 2019-01-09 | dhavalpatel095 | 88 | view |
- Some people think that life experience is more important than the formal education provided is schools and universities. How far do you agree with this statement, and provide examples? 85
- Study needs time, peace and comfort, whereas employment needs the same thing. Someone says it is impossible to combine those two because one distract one another. Do you think it is realistic in our life today? 55
- Younger employees have more skills, knowledge and more motivated than older employees. To what extent do you agree or disagree, support your argument with your own experience? 77
- In a cashless society , people use more credit cards. Cashless society seems to be a reality, and how realistic do you think it is? What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 55
- The majority of television news being reported is bad news: wars, famines, accidents and crime. Some people think that television news should be a mixture of good and bad news.Choose whether you agree or disagree with this statement and discuss why you ch 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 512, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...tdated pretty fast. They need engineers who are well-versed in the latest programming l...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, hence, however, if, likewise, so, well, while, for example, in my opinion, more or less, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 20.9802955665 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52413793103 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1116156896 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527586206897 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 496.8 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 12.6551724138 142% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.8336149829 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0 104.977214359 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1111111111 20.9669160288 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.25397266985 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268218448675 0.242375264174 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824673863952 0.0925447433944 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10559913104 0.071462118173 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196384313647 0.151781067708 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101018606374 0.0609392437508 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.1260098522 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.