Younger employees have more skills, knowledge and more motivated than older employees. To what extent do you agree or disagree, support your argument with your own experience?
Nowadays, there is an ongoing debate younger employees are more skilled as well highly motivated than older employees, which attached plethora of controversies and drawn the attention from the public. it can be said that young people are more energetic as well as they are more familiar with new technologies which enables more opportunities for them, while on the other hand some stands with contrary prospective. this essay will discuss both sides and lead to logical conclusion based on my experience.
At the outset, there are myriads reason why young staffs are beneficial for companies and the most vital reasoning is that they are not as much expensive like older employees which is the best part of any organisation. As an illustration, manufacturing units always need highly energetic and young people to work there because they are more beneficial for company as well as people to produce output on cheap cost. Thus, young employees have advantages over older staff due to they are cost effective as well as physically more cabable.
On the other hand, some hold the view for older employees and as per them older staff has a higher experience of industry which is add-on for any employer also. As per survey conducted in my college project resulted, 40% of older staffs are required in higher managements as well as other high technical jobs and for this most essential reason for their experience in industry which enables their demands. Hence, need of older staff is not in decline and its completely depends on the job nature.
Agglomerating above all points, it can be concluded that, the requirement of employes is depends on nature of jobs in some places young people can do better, whereas some requires older people to handle work with high productivity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-31 | Maheswari | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | kathyngo95 | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-25 | hemsingh81 | 80 | view |
| 2019-02-05 | baran.bahrani | 88 | view |
| 2019-01-09 | dhavalpatel095 | 88 | view |
- Globalization has brought people closely together, especially in culture, communication and business field. What do you think? 88
- What roles should government, companies and individual play to combat climate change ? 11
- Vegetarianism is a more ethical practice than eating meat.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this statement. Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations. 77
- The life that a person has depends on the personality, to what extent do you agree? From your own experience and examples. 85
- Do you think that place where the person grew up has an influence on his accomplishments? Explain with examples. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 202, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...nd drawn the attention from the public. it can be said that young people are more ...
^^
Line 1, column 416, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... some stands with contrary prospective. this essay will discuss both sides and lead ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 156, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...dustry which is add-on for any employer also. As per survey conducted in my college ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, so, thus, well, whereas, while, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1487.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 296.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02364864865 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6780612318 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537162162162 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 465.3 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.5024630542 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.7402046032 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.7 104.977214359 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6 20.9669160288 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171472251928 0.242375264174 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755959578456 0.0925447433944 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601289423378 0.071462118173 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105781514462 0.151781067708 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614300995299 0.0609392437508 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 53.1260098522 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.43 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.3980295567 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.