Paleo diets, in which one eats how early hominids (human ancestors) did, are becoming increasingly popular. Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food, especially bone broth, a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours. They believe it has many health-promoting nutrients, such as cartilage, which can heal our joints, and chondroitin, which promotes nerve regeneration. Skeptics point out that ingested cartilage can’t replenish cartilage in your knees or elbows and ingested chondroitin doesn’t make our brains any healthier. Yet, there is strong anecdotal evidence that people who consume bone broth have fewer metabolic and inflammatory diseases than those who don’t. Therefore, ancient humans knew something about our physiology that we don’t, and that by emulating the way they ate, we can cure many chronic illnesses.
The argument is flawed for numerous reasons. Primarily, the assumption that simply eating bone broth will regenerate already lost tissue in the human body.
Paleo diet relies on consuming the food early - this can help due to the fact that the body gets a longer time to digest the food properly. The argument is assuming that eating food early will reduce the urge to consume junk and fast foods.
The assumption that the body has evolved to develop a capacity of regenerating crucial lost tissues. This can be supported by eating healthy foods like bone broth but they are definitely not the major source. The body is known to absorb important nutrients from the food that we eat. The body cannot regenerate tissues by simply ingesting it. It needs a well-formed diet to support the process of tissue regeneration. Bone broth is simply one of the sources that will help in doing it and not the crux of it.
Since bone broth contains animal bones - it should have numerous nutrients that are very helpful for the human body. As stated in the argument, consuming it regularly will lead to having fewer metabolic and inflammatory diseases but that does not mean that it will cure such chronic disease existing diseases.
Based on the assumptions stated in the argument, it can be said that it is a way towards living a healthy life rather than a way of curing chronic diseases.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jason123 | 69 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | Chayank_11 | 57 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | hyunjulia99 | 75 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | neha1980 | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | noitsimani | 61 | view |
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 50
- Paleo diets, in which one eats how early hominids (human ancestors) did, are becoming increasingly popular. Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food, especially bone broth, a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours. They 33
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.6327345309 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 28.8173652695 80% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 55.5748502994 41% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 16.3942115768 43% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1150.0 2260.96107784 51% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 239.0 441.139720559 54% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81171548117 5.12650576532 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.56307096286 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46206738248 2.78398813304 88% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 204.123752495 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539748953975 0.468620217663 115% => OK
syllable_count: 358.2 705.55239521 51% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 19.7664670659 66% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.8300804523 57.8364921388 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4615384615 119.503703932 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3846153846 23.324526521 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.30769230769 5.70786347227 23% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228937787295 0.218282227539 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084578957386 0.0743258471296 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653429897502 0.0701772020484 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119355168259 0.128457276422 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660546617814 0.0628817314937 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 14.3799401198 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.3550499002 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.197005988 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.5979740519 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.32208582834 96% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 98.500998004 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.