The government should spend money in promoting sport and art in school, rather sponsoring professional sports and art events in communities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people argue that authorities should invest in sport and art facilities in campus instead of supporting occupational sports or art in society. In my opinion, both in-campus and off-campus sport and art are equally important, which should be emphasized by government unbiasedly.
It is obviously that investing in school facilities can greatly benefit students’ extra-curricular life. Firstly, it will increase students’ participation and enthusiasm towards sport and art. By doing sport activities, for example, students’ physical fitness and willpower will be cultivated. Similarly, by visiting campus galleries, students could broaden their horizons and consequently improve their views of aesthetics. Besides, in this day and age, students are under huge academic pressure, which means that there should be a pathway for them to release their stress. Undoubtedly, taking part in more sport and artistic activities will be a reasonable choice. In addition, compared with societal professional sport and art events which tend to be sponsored by business organizations, campus facilities need more financial supports from the government.
However, investing money in school by no means that the governments should ignore societal sports and arts. In fact, the government could attract more citizens’ attention towards professional sports and art events such as local sports clubs and art exhibitions by pouring its funds to them. This practice will also be an effective method to stimulate local economy because more people would like to pay for watching sport games or exhibitions. Furthermore, the governments’ sponsorship in sports and arts can also encourage more residents to take part in these leisure activities. It can boost interaction and communication of the neighbourhood and eventually promote social harmony. Therefore, governments’ support is also of vital importance for the development of community.
In conclusion, it is appropriately that financial budget should be allocated proportionately to both school and society to improve the athletic and artistic amenities, by which they can make life more diverse and colorful.
- In many countries, there are more people choose to live by themselves than before. What are the reasons of this situation? Is it positive or negative development of society? 73
- Human activities have negative effects on plant and animal species Some people think it is too late to do anything about this problem Others believe that effective measures can be taken to improve this situation Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Multi-cultural society, where people of different ethnic groups live together, can bring more benefits than drawbacks to country. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- For school children, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The leaders or directors of organizations are often older people, but some people say that young people can also be a leader. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, similarly, so, therefore, thus, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1875.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87774294671 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3503449191 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570532915361 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.668320161 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.1875 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9375 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9375 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309308630546 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109599640065 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0856556941809 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189347835441 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0941965284857 0.056905535591 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.82 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.