People in communities can make decisions that protect and improve the natural environment. Which
one of the following three actions is most useful for people to do if they want to help the environment
in their local community? Explain why?
1. Plant trees and create parks
2. Persuade local shops to stop providing plastic bags to customers
3. Increase access to public transportation (for example, buses or trains) to reduce the number of
automobiles on local roads
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, taking care of the environment has gotten important for everyone. In this regard, there is a controversial question asking whether devoting budgets for transportation is more major or other issues like growing trees and stop using plastic. I agree to spend money on commuting and help people to have better buses and subways. The reasons to substantiated my idea are explored in the following.
First of all, a lot of cars and their fuels have influenced the climate and good transportation can prevent air pollution. To put on the other hand, individuals who use an automobile for going to his job and coming back utilize lots of energy and this releases to the air. Surely, this kind of air is harmful to all animals living in the environment. As an illustration, I am going to speak about my town, Tehran. people in Tehran has been using their personal cars for several years and they used to huge traffic in highway, these days the government tries to improve the quality of taxis and these types of automobiles to decrease the amount of air pollution because it leads to negative effects on trees and it is dangerous for the birds of Tehran. This example demonstrates the importance of high-level transportation to rescue an environment.
Second, local communities always need the absence of harsh sound and it can be possible if they have fewer cars in their street. To be specific, one of the difficulties for every environment is the impacts of very high voices which maybe stem from cars. It is crystal clear, a condition in which persons can reach their destination with some things such as subways makes neither inconvenient sounds nor disturbing the sooth of the environment. A personal experience of mine can drive this fact home. A year ago, I traveled to the USA for an event. In there, while I was preparing for my presentation, I attract to the serenity of the environment, when I asked my friend who lived there, he told me " they never use private cars; therefore, they have no bad sound in their city". If the city had never compelled its people to start using transportation, they would not have a sense of relaxation.
By and large, I do believe transportation is a considerable issue for protecting the environment. Since it stops air pollution and its negative effects on the animals and also it destroys harsh sounds in the zone.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-08 | Amin Beheshti | 76 | view |
- Older teenagers 16 19 should be allowed to work at paid part time jobs 70
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 58
- Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site 3
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. 66
- Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 415, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...m going to speak about my town, Tehran. people in Tehran has been using their personal...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, second, so, therefore, while, kind of, such as, by and large, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 8.0752688172 310% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1973.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 408.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83578431373 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9137281292 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571078431373 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.4809804781 48.9658058833 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.842105263 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4736842105 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05263157895 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229518889795 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0597484943063 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475947848678 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124442127395 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394597614943 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.