It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
Nowadays, ways of working have gotten important for companies. Regard this fact, there is a controversial question expressing whether companies should emphasize long hours with short days for employees or short hours with long days. I agree with the opinion which is choosing more days and fewer hours. The reasons to substantiate my idea are explored in the following.
First, concentrating on a job is the foremost indicator for every company in the way of improving. To put on the other hand, employees who have enough time to feel free also adequate time to think about the problems of projects have better performance than people who have to finish their work in less time and three days. As an illustration, I am going to speak about my friend who used to work for two companies coincide. Once upon a time, while he was preparing one of the most important projects of the company, his boss told him that you are not concentrating on our project and you have to quit the company. My friend had lost his job because he worked there three days with ten hours for each day, As a result, he could not manage all the problems for both companies.
Second, an employee who is tired every day cannot promote a company that has a lot of wishes. Surely, working for ten hours a day will decrease the performance of a person who tries to solve the problems of a project. Under such a circumstance, everyone faces difficulties and this event makes harmful vibe for a company. As an illustration, I have been leading the developers of a computer company, since I joined there. At first, we should work 2 days and for each day we had to spend 10 hours on projects, at the end of the day, everyone feels tired and they could not help each other to find the solutions. Therefore, we change the hours of working from 2 days to 4 days and instead of 10 hours we chose 7 hours a day. After the decision, all employees felt better and work, strongly. If we had not changed the hours, our employees would not work better.
By and large, I do believe long days with short hours, is a better choice for companies. Since the people of a company have enough time to concentrate on the projects also would not feel tired during the projects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people. 59
- For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children(five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities. 90
- It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts. 76
- Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would be impossible First, atmospheric 3
- At the end of the Triassic period 200 million years ago, there was a mass-extinction event that caused the extinction of more than half of all living species. It was this extinction event that allowed dinosaurs to become the dominant species for the next 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 90, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ours, is a better choice for companies. Since the people of a company have enough tim...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, therefore, while, as a result, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1825.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 402.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53980099502 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57445261025 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487562189055 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 550.8 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8085036193 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0526315789 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1578947368 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78947368421 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365888850468 0.236089414692 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112139784852 0.076458572812 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628935625653 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224588160604 0.150856017488 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525591066708 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 10.9000537634 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.11 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.