Wild animals have no place in the 21st century and trying to reserve these animals is a waste of resources. To what extant do you agree or disagree?
With the advent of technology in the 21st century, some people believe that wild animals have no place, and the budgets should allocated in other projects rather than reserving them. In my opinion wild life preservation programs are substantial for continuous life. In this essay the beneficial of wild creatures and the need of them will be analyzed.
One of the most important issues which threaten our ecosystem is wildlife devastation. All animals belong to “food chain”, that means they are connected to each other because the bigger ones eat the smaller creature. In addition, the food chain prevents from ecological problems that effect on overpopulation of some animals and due to that deterioration of special crops. For instance, if the number of foxes in some area fall down, the number of rats will boost. In the following, the enhanced rats will cause to environmental degradation.
Moreover, wild animals must be preserved to use of tourist attraction and educational purposes. Most of the tourist that goes to Africa, attracts to wildlife safari and spending time near wild creatures to decrease their curiosity. Meanwhile, studying of the behavior and the ecology of them, assist researchers to optimize their inventions. For example, investigation of aerodynamic of tiger’s physics while it is running, could have extremely helped automobiles designer’s interpretation.
Last but not least, wildlife and its ecosystem are auxiliary to our health. The corpses of the wild animals that are eaten by other ones, are the best for fertilizers. They are appropriate source for reformation process of fossil fuel likewise, also the dead bodies of the Marine wild creatures for creation of the oil. In addition they are some drugs that initiates of them are biological factors of wild animals. For instance, there are some medicines that are made from snake's or scorpion's poison.
In conclusion, it is obvious that wild animals are not only be against wasting resources but also are investing for better future of next generation. Although preserving animals, whatever they are, wild or domestic, with profit or without any profit, and little or big is an international duty. They as well as other creature of God deserve to live in this world.
- Do you agree that modern technology has given us more leisure time than before? 78
- You live in a room in college which you share with another student. However, there are many problems with this arrangement and you find it very difficult to work. Write a letter to the accommodation officer at the college. In the letter,•Describe the si 70
- In many countries people working in sport and entertainment earn much more money than professions like doctors, nurses and teachers. Why do you think this happens in some societies and do you consider it is good or bad? 78
- Many companies sponsor sports as a way of advertising themselves. Some people think that it is a good thing, while others think that it has disadvantages. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 67
- Prison is common way in most countries to solve the problem of crime. However, a more effective solution is to provide people a better education. Do you agree or disagree? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 324, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...d creatures for creation of the oil. In addition they are some drugs that initiates of t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, likewise, moreover, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1927.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29395604396 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93411223571 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585164835165 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0374793426 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.35 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164370953806 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.046043544711 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588647286211 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0952445319074 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483359460785 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.