The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
The bar chart provides information about the total amount of minutes that the British spent on telephone calls which distinguish into three types of calls between 1995 and 2002.
Overall, the local fixed-line that majority spent in the UK experienced some fluctuations throughout the period, while the national and international fixed-line calls and mobile calls showed an upward trend from the beginning till 2002.
To be more precise, the total minutes of local fixed-line calls was about 72b in 1995, being higher than the other two calls. Then, it hit the highest point of about 90b in 1999. However, the figure showed a gradual decrease in the following year and continued to decline to the end of the period around 72b as the same amount as in 1995.
Furthermore, the British spent approximately 38b on national and international fixed-line calls in 1995, whereas the mobile calls were around one-fourth amount of previous calls. However, the national and international fixed-line calls experienced a moderate increase of almost 3b per year, and it rose to about 61b in 2002. Whereas mobile calls showed a steady growth by around 12b in 1999, and the number had increased significantly to nearly one half of the overall figure in 2002.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | Nguyễn Thành Vinh | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | aghasaeed | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | rahulsd | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | morbymuku | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | Saeed Najd Ataei | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. 67
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. 73
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station. 67
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 86
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1052.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13170731707 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73781547067 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536585365854 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9960138685 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.5 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277457070335 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118722025597 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0958909279592 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186040853018 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0927469469231 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.