many people want their country to host an international sporting event. other think that it will creates more problems than benefits. discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
International sporting events has been considered as an efficacious way to not only bring the image of the country into the world but also to generate significant economic value. However, it is argued that these events will do more harm than good to the individuals as well as the society. From my perspective, I believe that hosting a sporting event is highly likely to creates more problems rather than bring benefits. My following essay will discuss both these views and give a clear explanation to my opinion.
To commence with, there is no denying that people can reap a lot of benefits from hosting a big sporting event. Initially, this is regarded as a way for the nation to gain international prestige, build its reputation and dignity. The national image, the traditional cultures and other country’s assets will be much more renowned by means of the promotion of people from all over the world. As long as the event runs smoothly, the country will move to a higher position in the global stage, which are in the services of driving more tourists to the country. Furthermore, in all likelihood, an international sporting event will boost the national economy. An influx of tourists every day makes an enormous contribution to yield a sustainable flow of revenues. Many world-class services, all types of business also flourish, lead to foreign investments and increase wealth.
Nonetheless, despite of all the above mentioned benefits, there also exists come shortcomings. First, it is common knowledge that to be capable of setting up a big sporting event, there are billions of dollars spent with the aim of upgrading the infrastructures of transportations and other public services. For some developing countries whose can not utilize their limited resources to invest to these luxurious events, this will create a financial burden on their citizens and also more external debts. In addition to that, these events will inevitable entail some risks related to security. A colossal number of visitors will make it almost impossible to undergo a thorough security check on all of them, which can pose a threat to the safety of the event and also the host country. Additionally, the venues of events can be targeted by terrorist groups, landing the country to grave danger.
To sum up, due to the drawbacks of hosting these events, I wholeheartedly believe it is advisory that third world countries should not shoulder the responsibility to set up these events.
- In the future, students will have the choice of studying at home by using technology such as computers or television of studying at traditional schools. What would you prefer? 84
- With increasing populations and ever growing urban centers, many countries are losing their natural beauty spots. What benefits are there to protect places of natural beauty. How can this be solved? 73
- The importance of fresh water to life and offer your own solutions to preserve this very valuable natural resource. 89
- Some people think certain prisoners should be made to do unpaid community work instead of being put behind bars To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
- Some people with a good education and experience decide to move abroad to work Why is that What problems does it cause 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 515, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...give a clear explanation to my opinion. To commence with, there is no denying th...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... responsibility to set up these events.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, nonetheless, so, third, well, in addition, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2084.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 408.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10784313725 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93248716431 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561274509804 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 654.3 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8914552335 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.777777778 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.397425526234 0.244688304435 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109341338695 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624666809588 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219683982987 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105600924624 0.056905535591 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.