The bar chart compares and contrasts data on the difference in the number of people in both genders attending some sports in New Zealand in 2002.
Generally speaking, girls had a tendency of participating in team sports rather than their counterparts did, with the exception of soccer.
A closer look at the diagram shows that the number of girls chosing to take part in netball was far more than that of the opposite gender. The number of males, however, having an inclanation towards soccer with roughly 25% which was five times greater than females did. The same situation happened to cricket which only a few girls enjpyed, while more than 10% of their counterparts took up this sport. A further point to note is, tennis and basketball, were enjoyed by both genders with around 12% to 13% of each. Swimming witnessed a high tendency of girls and boys taking part in with approximately 13% and 22% respectively.
- The graph below shows the average class size in six countries and compares it with the world average class size in 2006 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main points and give comparisons where relevant 42
- The diagram below shows time spent watching TV by age and gender in the UK in 1995 and 1999 Summerise the information by selecting the main features and make comparations where relevant 92
- Fossil fuel is the main source of energy. In some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. To what extent do you think it is a positive or negative development? 67
- Some animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in the sea What are the reason What solution to solve them 95
- The chart below shows the number of jobs in tourism related industries in one UK citiy between 1989 and 2009 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...rts rather than their counterparts did, with the exception of soccer. A closer look at the diagram...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 764.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86624203822 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6296246034 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649681528662 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 12.1873135779 43.030603864 28% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.142857143 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0559100238715 0.215688989381 26% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0284405448713 0.103423049105 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501735167877 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0614951130772 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617608807934 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.