Families who do not send their children to government-financed schools should not be required to pay taxes that support universal education.
To what extent do u agree or disagree with this statement.
Irrespective of sending children to government-financed schools, people from all walks of life have to pay taxes to generate income to run these schools effectively. Some people regard this justified while others are of the view that this is against betterment of a society. I am, however, in complete support of first argument thinking that everybody should pay equal amount of taxes as a gesture of supporting education.
To begin with, paying taxes makes a government's economy strong in the first place. This in return, opens newer pathways for knowledge seekers. The higher the taxes are paid by inhabitants, the more strong educational, health and economical system of a country becomes. For instance, 50% of the income of the Norwegians is reverted back to government in the form of tax which, in result, has contributed in the provision of free education in Norway. Thus, a country's economy and over all educational standards boost up with joint contribution of all masses who pay taxes.
Secondly, i reckon that narrowing down funding of government financed schools by limiting tax paying people can produce detrimental results on education system of a country. The gap between educational standards of the private and government-supervised institutions could widen. In addition, a clear segregation of two groups of students would become evident resulting in negativity and inferiority complex among government schools students. An obvious demarcation among students of private versus government schools in developing countries like pakistan, india etc is the supporting evidence in this regard. Hence, to avoid such scenario and to provide equal opportunities to every student, every family should support government schools.
Finally, to obtain quality education is the basic right of every individual. To gather funds from income from taxes and to spend it on betterment of society is what is required to make a welfare state. So, regardless of extent of utilization of the educational facilities provided by the state, government should remain adherent to adoption of policies leading to fulfilling of vital necessities of common people.
In conclusion, the benefits are way too considerable of every family of a state contributing towards government-financed schools in the form of taxes. It strengthens government's economy as a whole, eliminates dual standards of education and also provides basic educational facilities to common people with ease.
- In many parts of the world people are relying more and more on prepared food from grocery stores or restaurants because they are too busy to cook at home This is a bad idea because home cooked food is much better for us To what extent do u agree or disagr 67
- The table below shows the sales at a small restaurant in a downtown business district Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- The charts below shows the results of a survey that sampled a cross section of travelers at a major metropolitan airport about the purposes of their trip The survey was carried out in four different months Summarize the information by selecting and report 90
- There should be laws to control the amount and type of violence shown on television programs To what extent do u agree disgree with this statement 87
- Smoking is a habit which claims many lives and is a great drain on health services One way to combat smoking would be to make it illegal What are the pros and cons of such a government policy What alternative strategies can you suggest to combat smoking 85
Comments
is it because of over length
is it because of over length that this got 7 ?or the content?
381 words are not 'over
381 words are not 'over length'. It is moderate.
The shortcoming of the essay is the reason three which is a little bit away from the topic. Seems you have this issue in other essays.
Need to always focus on the topic. for example the premise of this topic is: 'Families who do not send their children to government-financed schools'. So all reasons should follow this premise.
Try this pattern which will help you focus on the topic:
Para 1: introduction. my choice: A or B. agree or disagree.
Para 2: First,reason 1 (1 sentence) + why reason 1(some arguments. 2-3 sentences) + examples for reason 1 (around 2 sentences) + small conclusions (like advantages of reason 1 or comparisons if not reason 1, 1-2 sentences).
Para 3:Second,reason 2 ,blabla... do the same thing like First
Para 4:Third, reason 3 blabla... do the same thing like First but shorter
Para 5: Conclusion.
Let us know if you didn't get the point.
yes i got the point that how
yes i got the point that how the 3rd reason is not related to topic..thanks anyways
the benefits are way too considerable of every family of a state
Description: can you re-write this sentence?
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 381 350
No. of Characters: 2042 1500
No. of Different Words: 208 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.418 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.36 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.188 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 165 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 126 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 88 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 63 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.167 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.002 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.317 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.544 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.044 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5