One month ago, all the showerheads on the first five floors of Sunnyside Towers were modified to restrict the water flow to approximately 1/3 of its original force. Although actual readings of water usage before and after the adjustment are not yet available, the change will obviously result in a considerable savings for Sunnyside Corporation, since the corporation must pay for water each month. Except for a few complaints about low water pressure, no problems with showers have been reported since the adjustment. Clearly, restricting water flow throughout all the 20 floors of Sunnyside Towers will increase our profits further.
The argument makes a number of assumptions regarding the saving in water usage after decreasing water pressure on the first five floors of the corporation building. Unless the assumptions will not prove, the argument will fall apart.
The argument assumes that there is a significant saving in water usage without actual reading made. It is not persuasive to prove a water-saving unless reliable data supports how much it is saved comparing to earlier months. Moreover, some residents complained about low water pressure while the writer does not give any precise details.
Another assumption is the rest of the building is convenient to apply similar adjustments in order to save from water consumption. The first issue to consider is that how it is possible to send water up to the twentieth floor if the water pressure would decrease. Probably, residents in some floors could not have potable water due to low water pressure. In order to decrease water consumption in the corporation building, alternative methods could apply.
To conclude, the argument shows unreliable assumptions and insufficient evidence on the efficiency of the technique. Unless the assumptions will not prove, the argument will fall apart.
- One month ago, all the showerheads on the first five floors of Sunnyside Towers were modified to restrict the water flow to approximately 1/3 of its original force. Although actual readings of water usage before and after the adjustment are not yet availa 33
- Some people believe that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction. Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with 75
- The following appeared in a letter from a firm providing investment advice to a client. “Homes in the northeastern United States, where winters are typically cold, have traditionally used oil as their major fuel for heating. Last year that region experi 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 235, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ot prove, the argument will fall apart. The argument assumes that there is a sig...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.6327345309 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.9520958084 54% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 11.1786427146 9% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 13.6137724551 15% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 28.8173652695 17% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 55.5748502994 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 16.3942115768 67% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1042.0 2260.96107784 46% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 193.0 441.139720559 44% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39896373057 5.12650576532 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 4.56307096286 82% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86098582174 2.78398813304 103% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 204.123752495 51% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544041450777 0.468620217663 116% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 705.55239521 46% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 19.7664670659 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 22.8473053892 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.2706059781 57.8364921388 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.7272727273 119.503703932 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5454545455 23.324526521 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72727272727 5.70786347227 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201362902424 0.218282227539 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854973641152 0.0743258471296 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751681784905 0.0701772020484 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121821252583 0.128457276422 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0738228535764 0.0628817314937 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.3799401198 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.3550499002 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 12.5979740519 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.32208582834 107% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 98.500998004 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.1389221557 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.