Some companies spend a lot of money on scientific research and use animals for testing. Many argue that this is for a just cause while others say otherwise. Do the advantages of using animals in research outweigh its disadvantages?
Support your answer with specific reasons and examples
The animal is the first choice for testing in scientific study. It takes not only a lot of money but also leads to many argue from an animal protection association. Since the research tend to further step, using animals give more advantages than disadvantages.
Firstly, a company should have a big enough project that is willing to pay a huge amount of cost for keeping animals. Such a project can bring to a potential application on human health, such as vaccines. Although that project put the animal into a difficult life or terrible disease, we have to accept that fact. slower readily vaccines are, faster deadly people are.
Secondly, testing on animals is much safer than on humans. In addition, we can conduct the test much time. Hence, the reliability of the research can be enhanced. For example, Zika disease happens when a Zika virus transfer from monkeys to people. To fabricate vaccines, we can not try on the human body for the first time. One more reason is that it is impossible to be successful for the first time. So, a test monkey is acceptable.
However, a permission company for researching animals should prepare good living conditions for animals. In addition, they should prepare realistic purposes before starting a long-running project. 30 years ago, a company has 30 monkeys for their study. After the first stage, they did not receive any more funding support. Hence, they found an island in Indonesia to let the monkey out. However, those monkeys cannot seek food by themselves because it did not learn from parents after a long time in the laboratory. Therefore, half of them died. Others were fed by local residents nearby. That story did not happen if the company followed the rules from the first stage.
In conclusion, researching on animals is necessary for human health. However, IT IS important to note that protecting animals for research is also important.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-10 | Sanaullah97 | 82 | view |
| 2019-10-17 | Mike_Moody | 62 | view |
| 2018-07-11 | RockyGagKy | 86 | view |
- More and more people claim that modern work patterns are a source of stress. What do you think the caused of this? can you suggest some possible solutions? 84
- Some people choose to eat no meat or fish. They believe that this is not only better for their own health but also benefits the world as a whole. Discuss this view and give your own opinion. 73
- Living in big cities is bad for people's health.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 84
- To some people studying the past has little value in the modern world. Why do you think it is important to do so? What will be the effect if children are not taught history? 61
- Some people argue that higher taxes should be collected from industries causing higher industrial pollution, whereas others argue that there are better ways to deal with it. Discuss both view and give opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 262, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ive more advantages than disadvantages. Firstly, a company should have a big eno...
^^^^
Line 3, column 315, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Slower
...e disease, we have to accept that fact. slower readily vaccines are, faster deadly peo...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 370, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vaccines are, faster deadly people are. Secondly, testing on animals is much saf...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 174, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...pare realistic purposes before starting a long-running project. 30 years ago, a company has 3...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 673, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ollowed the rules from the first stage. In conclusion, researching on animals is...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.965625 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62552822066 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56875 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 16.0721442886 156% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.2975951904 59% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.2464334115 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 63.56 106.682146367 60% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.8 20.7667163134 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.12 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 3.4128256513 410% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255206285074 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686416572289 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748333242365 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165832475511 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0980418079707 0.056905535591 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 13.0946893788 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 50.2224549098 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.66 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.1190380762 67% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.