Some people believes that the cavity between the poor’s and riches going wider day by day. Therefore, rich mobs still holds high percent of market share whereas beggared are suffering from the poverty. There are many causes that can accord and I will discuss in upcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, lets analyze some causes. Firstly, criminal activities can be rised in future. To prove that point if an indivisiaul cannot make money to cover up their basic need like food, house, then it can be force them to do criminal activities like snatching or robbery to create a sufficient funds for his family. Secondly, there will be a less chances for a poor person to get a quality education. To illustrate it, child form from a rich family always went to higher and better colleges for the further studies whereas the child of poor person have no chance to complete his high school.
Probing further, this problem can be solved by taking some measurable steps. Firstly, government can provide them a job chances or can encourage them to become an entrepreneur with support. So they can rise up from the poverty and stay away from the criminal activities. Secondly, they can also provide scholarship to those students who want to learn and better future s they can easily support themselves during their studies.
To sum up, I would like to say that the economy inequality is brooding in many countries but it can be solved by the governments if they take some measurable steps.
- Some people believe that natural ability is necessary to be successful at sports. Others believe that hard work and practice is more important. Discuss both sides and add your own opinion. 56
- Increased ragging in colleges has caused much concern in the recent times and many people want it to be completely banned What is your opinion on this issue 31
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of human think for themselves will surely deteriorate?to what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- People living in large cities face several problems. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller towns? 56
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.Dis 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...rstly, criminal activities can be rised in future. To prove that point if an indivisiaul ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun chances is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...r his family. Secondly, there will be a less chances for a poor person to get a qual...
^^^^
Line 3, column 352, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'chance'?
Suggestion: chance
... family. Secondly, there will be a less chances for a poor person to get a quality educ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 429, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...upport themselves during their studies. To sum up, I would like to say that the ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nts if they take some measurable steps.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, whereas, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1237.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87007874016 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51945434475 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625984251969 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1276234994 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1538461538 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5384615385 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46153846154 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209243276625 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717405547229 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608984025117 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124194965282 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559373330129 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.