Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Technology has developed a lot over time. Now, technology is part of our daily life. We can safely assume that we are in connect with technology every second of our life. The prompt states that technology has made children less creative. I disagree with this statement for two reasons.
First, children using the present technology have internet, which connects everyone and provides information from every corner of the world. This makes it easier for children to understand and follow their dreams from a very young stage. For instance, children interested in music can learn and spread their work a lot easier with current technology. They can learn music sitting in their homes. Youngsters interested in any field can follow their passion from their homes. Television made the entertainment and news reach all the people in the world and inspires every child towards their dream. These examples prove that children of current generation have benefited a lot from the technology. The technology has made all the tools available for children at their disposal to create a masterpiece of their own work.
Second, technology makes it easier to work and provides tools to exceed the expectations. It also provides the works of others, so as to learn new things from anywhere. For instance, if a child wants to do some homework given in school, internet provides a great platform to understand and complete the work easily and creatively. Also, children find their inspiration for their work from the current technology. Technology has become the indispensable part of their lives especially in children's lives
Many people might argue that even though technology provides a lot of advantages inour lives, they make us lazy especially children who are exposed to them from a young age. But, I would like to think that when a child finds his interest in something, technology would immediately help him boost their skills. So, in conclusion, technology makes children more creative.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | Tharwat | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | ela87urb@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | ela87urb@gmail.com | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | star435 | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-11 | Isioma Nwayor | 70 | view |
- The sea otter is a small mammal that lives in waters along the western coast of North America from California to Alaska. When some sea otter populations off the Alaskan coast started rapidly declining a few years ago, it caused much concern because sea ot 73
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 129, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
.... It also provides the works of others, so as to learn new things from anywhere. For ins...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, as to, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 15.1003584229 20% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 322.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2049689441 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70076546552 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518633540373 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.5430887705 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.8 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.45110844103 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168690092436 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617327822254 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441316541893 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115267935504 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468435522752 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 86.8835125448 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.