A controversial topic is a sparky discussion to get involved into, regardless of the fact that, is the discussion with an elite or with someone who is open to ideas and interpretations of other people, or with someone who is adamant and unyielding and dogmatic about his core beliefs, either way, it will leave you stranded.
Having a debate or a discussion with someone over a controversial topic is a job for a daredevil, especially when the person with whom you are going to have this debate is one with contrasting views than yours, because he will try to bring you down in any possible way and most people in debate with contrasting thoughts and beliefs tend to suppress the other person's beliefs with their own.
A very rudimentary example of this is if you start a discussion with a person over which political party should lead the country or which political party is well suited for the economic growth or cultural growth of the country. If the person has conflicting or contradicting views than you or favors a different political party than you, you need to know one thing that you have just triggered a quarrelsome debate. It can also be seen in the parliament assembly where contradicting minds of all elites turn to rip off each other in every possible manner.
Such a debate with an adamant person, over his core beliefs, leads to no conclusion and certain minutes down the discussion you would yourself realize that this is not something fruitful or definitely not something you expected of a discussion. A discussion where your thoughts and views are not at all acknowledged and the other person is treating you condescendingly. So one should always stay away from getting into discussions with such adamant people who don't have any bend towards the acknowledgment of something better apart from what they believe.
Another reason for these people to have such kind of non-compromising attitude can also be because it is a way how their minds have been nurtured and how their mind has been shaped over the course of their life. Which is the most major and impactful factor in shaping one's mindset, be it their education, their companionship, or their personal life experiences. Such people with such mindsets cannot be changed. For example, if you get into a religious debate with someone and he has different beliefs or if he is an atheist, you could go into a never-ending debate which would exhaust you mentally and drain out all of your energy and still not come to any conclusion and the other person would still not be ready to acknowledge anything you say.
All the examples of such instances can be seen on new channels where people supporting different sides of an issue or beliefs get into a debate and how it eventually turns into a heated argument, and no one would even believe that they are elites.
But this may not always happen, sometimes there can be learnings and it can also happen in this same way. You can get to know a lot about their beliefs and their thoughts, also why that is their mind thinks or works this way and they have such beliefs. And if you happen to get into an interaction with someone who even after being questioned about his core beliefs is able to keep his calm and have a fruitful discussion. A lot of positive conclusions can be made out of such discussions.
But the probability of having such an interaction with someone who despite having contradicting views about his core beliefs would be open to changing his mind is very rare.
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership. 62
- The following was written as a part of an application for a small-business loan by a group of developers in the city of Monroe."A jazz music club in Monroe would be a tremendously profitable enterprise. Currently, the nearest jazz club is 65 miles aw 55
- Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals.(2) 66
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs 83
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ither way, it will leave you stranded. Having a debate or a discussion with som...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... other persons beliefs with their own. A very rudimentary example of this is if...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f each other in every possible manner. Such a debate with an adamant person, ov...
^^^
Line 7, column 461, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...iscussions with such adamant people who dont have any bend towards the acknowledgmen...
^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g better apart from what they believe. Another reason for these people to have ...
^^^
Line 9, column 269, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...t major and impactful factor in shaping ones mindset, be it their education, their c...
^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ready to acknowledge anything you say. All the examples of such instances can b...
^^^
Line 12, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uld even believe that they are elites. But this need not happen always, sometim...
^^^
Line 13, column 19, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put before the verb 'happen'.
Suggestion: always happen
... they are elites. But this need not happen always, sometimes there can be learnings and i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 14, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s can be made out of such discussions. But the probability of having such an in...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, well, apart from, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 34.0 14.8657303371 229% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 33.0505617978 182% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2897.0 2235.4752809 130% => OK
No of words: 608.0 442.535393258 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76480263158 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.9656475924 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72771312034 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.407894736842 0.4932671777 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 899.1 704.065955056 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 33.0 23.0359550562 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.2852744499 60.3974514979 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.944444444 118.986275619 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.7777777778 23.4991977007 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.97078651685 161% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29985887473 0.243740707755 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105190419274 0.0831039109588 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0910210202771 0.0758088955206 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162779209132 0.150359130593 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0928889397441 0.0667264976115 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 14.1392134831 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 48.8420337079 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.92 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 28.0 11.8971910112 235% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.2143820225 136% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.