Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it legal requirement.
To what extent do you think the laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
The term “3R”, which includes waste reducing, reusing and recycling has been spread out all over the world as one of efficient ways to protect our environment against being more and more polluted. Many people argue that to reduce the amount of waste discharging into the environment, there should be a strict law requiring citizens to recycle more. Personally, I completely agree with this view.
Among variety of reasons why it is necessary for the government to apply regulation encouraging everyone to convert waste materials into the new ones, there is one main reason which is citizens will consider recycling waste as their responsibility when that activity is stated in the law as a requirement. In Ho Chi Minh city, for example, a regulation of classification the household waste into recyclable and non-recyclable trash bins has been approved for a year. Compared to Hanoi capital where there are not any obligation for citizens to divide their rubbish into those two categories, the amount of waste that have been recycled is greater significantly since it is compulsory for people living in Ho Chi Minh city to obey that regulation while in Hanoi, people only recycle when they are in need of new materials.
Apart from the reason I have mentioned above, I also believe that the law will form a guideline of recycling process for everyone to follow. Nowadays, there is a wide range of waste converting progresses that several environment conservation organizations applying which might make it to be difficult for the government to control. However, by planning a standard process monitoring each step in waste recycling, for example, governing the place of waste classification and supervising the operation of waste recycling factories, the authorities will be able to manage the process effectively as well as reducing the citizen’s confusion over the recycling system. The amount of waste turning into new materials is, hence, increased to a certain extent.
In conclusion, for the reasons expressed above, I strongly believe that governing the obligation for citizens to recycle as much as possible is an essential way in saving our Earth by generating more and more new materials from waste.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-29 | nobitaa | 84 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
- Many people are afraid of leaving house because of crime. Some think more action should be taken to prevent crime, but others think little can be done. What is your view? 67
- Tests and examinations are a central feature of school systems in many countries.Do you think the educational benefits of testing outweigh any disadvantages? 67
- Nowadays children are experiencing increased educational social and commercial pressure What are the reasons for this What is a solution to reduce the pressure 92
- Chemicals tests on animals 67
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it legal requirement.To what extent do you think the laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wa 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, so, well, while, apart from, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1875.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2374301676 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02970144607 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525139664804 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 611.1 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 94.5712377431 49.4020404114 191% => OK
Chars per sentence: 170.454545455 106.682146367 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.5454545455 20.7667163134 157% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.45454545455 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311020669536 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11877059987 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500358140609 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186446334163 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343048603946 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 13.0946893788 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.54 50.2224549098 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.