The pie chart illustrates the percentage of five kinds of energy production of France in 1995 and 2005.
In general, it can be seen that the proportion of Petro production decreased, the opposite was true for other categories. Besides, the figure for coal was the highest during the period.
To begin with, in 1995, the figure for coal is similar to gas, about 30% each. After 10 years, the percentages of energy produced for coal and gas rose slightly to 30.93% and 30.31% respectively. By contract, the figure for Petro saw a reversed pattern in which it dropped from 29.27% in 1995 to just 19.55% in 2005.
Moving on with regard to the other energy, 2005 witnessed a gradual growth in the figure for nuclear of 3.6% from 6.4% in 1995. Also, starting at 4.9% in 1995, the proportion of other energy generated climbed minimally to 10.10% in 2005. However, nuclear and “other” still remained at the bottom of the percentage of energy production over the period.
- Some people think that it is better for students to learn local history than world history.Do you agree or disagree? 60
- Some people think governments should spend money on faster means of public transport. However, others think money should be spent on other priorities (such as the environment). Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 67
- TOPIC: Everyone should stay in school until they reach 18. Do you agree/disagree? 56
- The charts below show the comparison of some kinds of energy production of France in 2 years 61
- The map shows the development of an area from 1962 to present today. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, so, still, in general, to begin with, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 814.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87425149701 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69005603075 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574850299401 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.8113217051 43.030603864 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.4444444444 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.44444444444 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117572397999 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588732977651 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0951588824619 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109351805399 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120482039164 0.0819641961636 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.