Environmental protection is the responsibility of poliicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people may argue that protecting the environment is the responsibility of figures of authority instead of individuals. In my opinion, I strongly disagree with this statement. In the scope of this essay, several reasons and examples will be given to support my point of view.
Firstly, government’s policies can not be effective without the cooperation of individuals. As the number of politicians only occupies a small proportion in the whole population, they are not able to visit every region to apply proper methods in order to improve and maintain the surroundings. In fact, the only thing they can do is doing researches and imposing appropriate regulations. Thus, if individuals do not share hands with authority to mitigate the issues, no protection will be applied and the situation may get worse. A relevant example can be seen in the case of Vung Tau beach in Viet Nam. In 2005, while the government had placed numerous trash bins along the beach to keep it from pollution and had imposed heavy charge, many tourists visited this place littering and completely destroyed the intact beauty of this coastal area.
Secondly, the awareness of each people plays a paramount role in protecting the environment. While a single attempt may be consider inefficiency, the contribution of the whole population is a completely different story. If each of us fully understand what is the activities that can bring detrimental effects to the environment as well as acknowledge how to lessen them, pollution problems will be kept in an acceptable rate and even be improved. Taking the use of plastic bags which are the main cause of soil erosion and water pollution as an example, imagine if everyone of us recycle one of them after use instead of throwing these away. Assume that there are 7 billion people in the world, half of them uses at least one plastic bag them we will be able to decrease 3.5 billions of bags a day.
In conclusion, we can not overlook the importance of individuals in protecting the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-18 | Ngoc Anh 97 | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | TrucNgoc | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | TrucNgoc | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | TrucNgoc | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | Ngoc Khanh Ong | 84 | view |
- Governments investment on arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Government must invest this money in public services instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 89
- Student should be taught academic knowledge so that they can pass exam and skills such as cooking and dressing should not be taught To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
- Fossil fuels (coal,oil or natural gas) are the main sources in many countries. However,in some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy (wind and solar energy) are encouraged. Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 89
- Some people argue that we should do research into their family history. Others, agree with the view that we should focus on the present and future generations. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 89
- The increase in the production of consumer goods result in damage to natural environment. What are the causes of this? What can be done to solve this problem? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 774, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '5 billion'.
Suggestion: 5 billion
... bag them we will be able to decrease 3.5 billions of bags a day. In conclusion, we ca...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...decrease 3.5 billions of bags a day. In conclusion, we can not overlook the i...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, at least, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02647058824 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98049454803 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582352941176 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.44005772 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.933333333 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.06666666667 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163125645648 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609660200668 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076093937697 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123028280382 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0838474973931 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.