The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.
The chart manifests the fraction of people who own their places of living versus those who are staying in rented domiciles across England and Wales from 1918 to 2011. In a nutshell, the percentage of households who stay in their own accommodation has increased from 1918 to 2011, whereas the fraction of households who use rented domiciles shows a decline in the same period.
First, the households who live in rented housing decreased from 78 percent in 1918 down to about 37 percent in 2011. In all the years of this period, the trend was decreasing, except for 1953 when it remained at the same percentage as 1939, and for 2011, when it increased to 37 percent from a 31 percent in 2001.
Next, the percentage of people who owned their housing has risen from 23 percent in 1918 to 63 percent in 2011. Although the percentage of households who possessed their accommodation remained the same from 1939 to 1953, and diminished from 69 percent in 2001 to 63 percent in 2011, the general trend was rising.
Finally, at the beginning of the period in 1918, the percentage of renting households was 56 percent more than owning ones. The decreasing trend of buying households led to an equal 50 percent amount in 1971. Continuing this procedure led to a 26 percent higher percentage of those who own their housing with respect to those who live in rented domiciles at the end of the period in 2011.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-25 | Ji Due | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | CharanpreetSingh | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | Loi Chau | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Jay297 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | aria etemadi | 78 | view |
- TPO 54 3
- Loyalty can be detrimental too. 50
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of arts. 83
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 70
- Five years ago, at a time when we had difficulties in obtaining reliable supplies of high quality wool fabric, we discontinued production of our alpaca overcoat. Now that we have a new fabric supplier, we should resume production. This coat should sell ve 69
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, whereas, except for, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1164.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73170731707 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58774242662 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.434959349593 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.0993683893 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.333333333 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3333333333 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30768601505 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161258114515 0.103423049105 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878365926714 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213209807895 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0948212506666 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.