road or railwa?
When it is time for allocation of budget for transportation sector in a country, the debate over which type of infrastructure should be given more priority takes place between the citizens. Some believe that govenment should fund road but others believe that railway should be given more funding. However, Instead of choosing categorically one of the two as "best" option, in my veiw, choice of mode of transport which country should spend is contingent upon two factors: financial and topographic factors.
One of the factors determining the type of transportation infrastructure to be built by a government is financial and economic status of any country. In other words, economic status of govenment and its public will largely affect which mode of travel should a govenment prioritize. As cost involved in construction of railway project is exorbitantly high as compared to road, country which can manage larger financial budget for transportation sector can opt railway project; however, in nation with poor financial background, road project are generally feasible. For instance, in developed countries such as UK and USA, huge amount of funds are allocated for development project due to which large sum of money are prioritized towards building expensive subway in cities and towns. On the other hand, in poor country like Nepal, government cannot afford to spend large amount in transportation sector so road transportation is more preferred by the government. Hence, before deciding whether a government must go for road or railway, we must find out financial capabilities of a nation.
In addition to financial factors, geographical and topographical factors also play major role in deciding whether a country must focus on road or railways. Roads are technically viable in both plain and mountaineos region whereas railways mostly require flat surface for constructions and operations. So country having favourable topographic condition (plain region) can prioritize both roads and railway projects; while, for country which have most of the areas in higher altitude can only have option of road. So,choice of prioritizing any one of the two modes of transportation greatly depends upon topographic features of the country.
In conclusion, the subject matter is moot and there are no easy answers as appropriate choice for funding for either roads or railways depends upon financial and topographic features of nation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-28 | bishalpokharel1211 | 73 | view |
- hese days Internet-based courses have become a popular alternative to university-based courses. Some students prefer this type of learning because they do not need to attend lectures. Others argue that it is important to study at university. Discuss both 73
- The maps below show the town of Honeybourne in 1990 and today. 78
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide(CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 78
- The graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992. 73
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world. 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 513, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , choice
...ltitude can only have option of road. So,choice of prioritizing any one of the two mode...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 195, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ial and topographic features of nation.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, so, whereas, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2075.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47493403694 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10194194746 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527704485488 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 637.2 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.4588911989 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.214285714 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0714285714 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35714285714 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14151377468 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595269754679 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528281629037 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0979856619697 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401212964276 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.