The line graph showa the population growth in China, India, and the United States from 1950 to 2000

Essay topics:

The line graph showa the population growth in China, India, and the United States from 1950 to 2000

The line chart demonstrates the population development in China, India, and the United States over a course of 50 years, starting from 1950.

As can be seen from the chart, it is clearly evident that the population growth in all three countries had witnessed an upward tendency. The most dramatic increase was seen in China and India.

To specify, starting at the point of nearly 600 millions in China and approximately 400 millions in India, the population has dramatically climbed to more than 1200 and slightly over 1000 millions in these two countries in 2000. However, there was a small difference between these two countries. If India had a stable growth, there was some minor fluctuations in China. The population of China experienced stable increase from 1950 to 1960 before there was a marginally decrease within 5 years later. In the rest of the period, it went up sharply, reached a peak more than 1200 millions in 2002.

By comparison, there was also a steady growth but the United States’s resident raise very little. It gradually grew up, only fluctuated around 200 millions for 50 years.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-10-29 LinhCandy2801 84 view
2019-10-29 LinhCandy2801 84 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line chart demonstrates the populati...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...urse of 50 years, starting from 1950. As can be seen from the chart, it is cle...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ncrease was seen in China and India. To specify, starting at the point of nea...
^^
Line 5, column 460, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('marginally') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
...ease from 1950 to 1960 before there was a marginally decrease within 5 years later. In the rest of th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...peak more than 1200 millions in 2002. By comparison, there was also a steady g...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 931.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00537634409 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74973064406 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629032258065 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.059657561 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341334380178 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126359335513 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115790597909 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218009780938 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116367835603 0.0819641961636 142% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.