To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.
The statement states that if someone wants to understand the main aspects of societies and their characteristics, he must look closely at their major cities. While a lot of people would agree with this statement because major cities usually contain large number of people and they would reflect their traditions and characteristics to the environment around them. In my opinion, I disagree with this statement for many reasons.
Tourism is relatively high in major cities compared to other cities in a country. That leads those cities to be biased to what tourists would want or buy and that doesn’t show any characteristics of it’s original people. At the end any country would want to increase the number of tourists that visit their cities. So those cities start to change eventually to what satisfies the tourist instead of emitting its own color.
For instance, Japanese people don’t eat weird food of bugs and other things. But because it’s a popular misconception about them, they went with the vibe and started doing those things for the tourists. Which satisfied those tourists and led to an increase in the number of tourist. As well as, increasing revenue for those people who sells those foods.
Moreover, judging a whole society based on what one city, is crucial and unjust for the original people of the country. Usually society’s characteristics can be represented by a rainbow. It’s beauty is in its variety. If you only look at one city, even if it was a major one you would only see one color only and you will miss the whole picture. Communities and people in general have a lot of different characteristics to offer and if you wanted to see those you must zoom out and see the bigger picture. For instance judging the US by looking at New York will lead the person to miss all the beauty that is hidden in the rural side like Arkansas with its rivers and natural beauty.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | AkkineniAnuhya4 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | snowsss | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | snowsss | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | nikhil40507 | 33 | view |
| 2020-01-21 | lanhhoang | 83 | view |
- The following appeared in a health magazine published in Corpora.“Medical experts say that only one-quarter of Corpora’s citizens meet the current standards for adequate physical fitness, even though twenty years ago, one-half of all ofCorpora’s cit 43
- Collectors prize the ancient life-size clay statues of human figures made on Kali Islandbut have long wondered how Kalinese artists were able to depict bodies with such realistic precision. Since archaeologists have recently discovered molds of human head 63
- Claim: The best test of an argument is its ability to convince someone with an opposingviewpoint.Reason: Only by being forced to defend an idea against the doubts and contrastingviews of others does one really discover the value of that idea. 50
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities. 50
- Claim: The best test of an argument is its ability to convince someone with an opposingviewpoint.Reason: Only by being forced to defend an idea against the doubts and contrastingviews of others does one really discover the value of that idea. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 336, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding environment'?
Suggestion: the surrounding environment
...their traditions and characteristics to the environment around them. In my opinion, I disagree with this st...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, moreover, so, well, while, for instance, in general, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 328.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88719512195 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72951342379 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52743902439 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.8354932312 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2941176471 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2941176471 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47058823529 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149328221632 0.243740707755 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.046042149665 0.0831039109588 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418010903237 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0849107741791 0.150359130593 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546559988819 0.0667264976115 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 100.480337079 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.