The line graph compares the percentage of people who were 65 and over of three different nations from 1940 to 2040.
Overall, the rate of people in the 65 and over age group in Japan, Sweden and USA showed an upward trend. Futhermore, Japan was expected to see the most dramatic changes in its elderly population.
The period of 40 years starting from 1940, the population rate of USA and Sweden recorded a gradual increase to nearly 5%. However, in the following decade, there was unexpected fluctuations in the ratio population of two nations although it remained below 20%. It is noted that the figures of life expectancy in USA and Sweden increased significantly, ending with around 23% and 25% respectively in 2040.
Over the same period, elderly population in Japan has changed less than two above nations. It has dropped to about 3% over a 20 year period time from 1960 to 1980 before increasing gradually up to 10% in 2030. This figure then has climbed rapidly and took a lead, at 28% at the end of the survey.
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 61
- The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled (PMT) by transportation type in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, California and the rest of the world. 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 56
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 852.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73333333333 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5790226879 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633333333333 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.6493960577 43.030603864 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.6666666667 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.88888888889 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23266058632 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883767909225 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101751984692 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153007476688 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108426531108 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.