Tpo36-integrated
The reading passage and lecture have conflicting opinions about whether it is a good idea to use "cloud seeding" method which was invented to eliminate hail. hail is pieces of ice is released from clouds instead of snow or rain. The article strongly postulates that this method is very beneficial because of three compelling evidence. On the other hand, the listening adamantly delineates that none of the author's proofs is convincing.
First and foremost, according to the professor in the lecture, this method might have worked in laboratory condition; however, in real life, it will prevent any precipitation which forms snow and so on. Eventually, it will lead crops to damage because of severe drought. Nonetheless, the author offsets these points by declaring that scientist proved that this cloud seeding is beneficial in their laboratory experiment. To be more specific, the scientist added silver iodide to water vapour and it creates light snow, not hail pellets.
On top of this, the lecturer further asserts that asian evidence can not be repeated in the us due to its difference of climates and locations. In other words, asian experiment was conducted in cities which have plenty of air pollution. Hence, this experiment might have influenced by air population and this could turn into favourable condition to work it. However, this cloud seeding idea cannot work in unpolluted areas. These claims refute the writer's implications about this method worked very well in asian several countries to control their precipitation in their towns. Therefore, this idea will definitely work in America as well.
Lastly, the speaker in the lecture suggests that the local studies were about hail-damaged fields demonstrated that this method also affected neighbour areas such as East and West region of the United States in a same particular year. Thus, it clearly indicates that the illustration of reduction in hail damage was caused by natural variation, not cloud seeding. Nevertheless, the article counters these indications by insisting that a few local studies showed that this idea gave benefits to some central areas of the us. According to this study, it was reported that the number of hail-damaged crops was diminished due to this new method introduction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-17 | jeffhjz | 3 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | bijan54 | 3 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | alta | 3 | view |
| 2019-11-02 | zizi.dream | 3 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | zizi.dream | 3 | view |
- Why do you think people attend college or university? 85
- Were dinosaurs Reptiles or Endotherms? 80
- TPO29 integrated 80
- integrated essay TPO13 90
- TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 169, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Hail
...d which was invented to eliminate hail. hail is pieces of ice is released from cloud...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of the authors proofs is convincing. First and foremost, according to the pro...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...creates light snow, not hail pellets. On top of this, the lecturer further ass...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l definitely work in America as well. Lastly, the speaker in the lecture sugge...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, lastly, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, therefore, thus, well, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 22.412803532 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 30.3222958057 162% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.01324503311 319% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1926.0 1373.03311258 140% => OK
No of words: 364.0 270.72406181 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29120879121 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80292492182 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 145.348785872 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565934065934 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 419.366225166 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.407880344 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61111111111 7.06452816374 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 4.33554083885 323% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 63.6247240618 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.