People argue a controversial concept about whether it is better to have like-minded friends or differences may sometimes be beneficial. Although two notions can be true, I personally opine that having friends with differing ideas would be better.
On the one hand, spending time with friends who have the same beliefs as you, can definitely be great. This idea lead to a range of outcomes. Firstly, people having similar opinions can easily cope with and help each other in tough situations of decision-making, as they both have a specific mindset and can vividly see one’s problem from the same perspective of themselves. Secondly, being in touch with like-minded people minimizes the arguments among them. Since they always agree with each other’s ideas and there would be no space for conflicts. I remember a quote which says “you are the sum of five people around you”, so by choosing like-minded friends you would guaranty no challenges in your communications.
On the other hand, being in contact with various individuals, may have some positive impacts rather than being only in touch with like-minded friends. The first influence of this notion is that facing different believes gives us the chance to see different worlds and choose new ideas to change our own world. The second advantageous result is that if you would have friends with different approaches, this helps you to see the occasions from various view points, and it would surely give you the opportunity to solve problems with creative solutions. Therefore I personally think it can be beneficial to have friends with different ideas rather than like-minded friends.
To sum up, although having like-minded friends has numbers of positive aspects, communicating with people of different beliefs gives us some benefits compared to the first group.
- Some people think it is better to choose friends who always have the same opinion as them. Other people believe it's good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 61
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your pos 50
- We are increasingly becoming dependent on computers They are used in business hospitals crime detection and even to fly planes What things will they be used in the future Is this dependence on computers a good thing or should we be more suspicious of 78
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 105, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y have some positive impacts rather than being only in touch with like-minded fri...
^^
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'beliefs' (noun) instead of believes (verb)?
Suggestion: beliefs
...of this notion is that facing different believes gives us the chance to see different wo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 554, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...solve problems with creative solutions. Therefore I personally think it can be beneficial...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, as to, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2925170068 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87279483424 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561224489796 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2745804282 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.692307692 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6153846154 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313258558203 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118371195044 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535142366007 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197812477285 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345226930522 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.