Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild
animals and that this could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you
agree or disagree.
Nowadays, an increasing number of people are concerned about the object that financial support should be utilized. However, whether resources were harnessed to preserve wild animals or use for people population has caused heated debate. I agree with the view that we should invest large resources to protect wild animals as those species are crucial for human development.
First, it is obvious that wild animals play an active role in sustaining the eco-system which directly connecting to human habitant. Indeed, wild animals co-exist with some particular plants which maintaining green environment for human. Besides, some wild birds help to reduce harmless insects in farming and agriculture, leading to bumper crops.
Second, wild animals are the symbols of each religion and country which maintain the unique signatures of the areas they live. For example, panda which is the cultural symbol of China help to attract individuals from over the world visit China in order to observe this rare species. If the Chinese’s Government does not provide support to keep panda alive, this country will less attractive and famous in foreign people’s eyes.
It is also true that the human population needs to take in serious consideration of aid resource distribution. Because it is feasible for citizens to make the most of the money to enhance the quality of life such as improving health-care systems, transportation, infrastructure, education and so on. Those activities require a lot of money and time to complete the mission of taking care good for people life.
In conclusion, investing in wild animal not only superior to the natural environment but also optimize human lives. Meanwhile, we should not neglect the important proportion of resources distributing for people population. By doing so can humans and animals have a great co-existence at every turn.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-12 | Spring2019 | 84 | view |
- The table illustrates the differences in average hours and minutes that UK males and females spend on distinguish activities every day. 89
- The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014. 73
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museumsbetween June and September 2013.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisonswhere relevant. 67
- The table below presents the number of children ever born to women aged 40-44 years inAustralia for each year the information was collected since 1981.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisonswhere releva 78
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisonswhere relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, second, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37288135593 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88622917903 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637288135593 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.9534626249 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.666666667 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26666666667 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121130313507 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420381994957 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0222727530853 0.0667982634062 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0671062962769 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0175952446088 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.