The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014.
The line graph illustrates the change in the quantity of books read by males and females at Burnaby Public Library between 2011 and 2014.
As can be seen from the graph, at the started point in 2011, the number of books read by women was almost double that by men. 20 years later, in 2013, male reader ‘s books caught up with women reader’s books at 10000 books, then reaching to the peak at 14000 books in 2014, more than 1.75 times that by women.
The graph also shows a continuously sharply increase in books read by men, slightly growth between 2011 and 2012, followed by a rapid constantly soar to 1000 books and 14000 books in 2013 and 2014. Meanwhile, there was a significant fluctuation in books read by the female during the 4 years period, steady growth from 5000 books in 2011 to double at 10000 books in 2013, then plummeted to the bottom at 7000 books in 2014.
In conclusion, despite of having higher beginning state, women have a downward trend of reading books than men, throughout the 4 years period from 2011 to 2014.
- The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014. 73
- the table below gives information about underground railway systems in 6 cities 73
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 72
- The graphs below provide information on global population figures and figures for urbanpopulations in different world regions.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisonswhere relevant. 11
- It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order toprevent illness than to spend on treatment of people who are already ill. To what extent doyou agree or disagree? 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 867.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61170212766 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29310848782 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542553191489 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.2345316731 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.5 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.3333333333 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.544469210641 0.215688989381 252% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.297951388373 0.103423049105 288% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804915702145 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.342606610884 0.15604864568 220% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624234728538 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.85 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.05 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.