construct new buildings rather than wasting money on maintaining old ones
Nowadays communities from all over the world have different thoughts about construction and conservation buildings. Some demographics of society claim that it is better and more prospective to build new settings instead of simple waste government's money on maintaining old buildings. This essay will argue why preservation of old parts of towns and cities is entirely necessary despite some opposite views.
People have always moderated and upgraded the appearance of their places of living in terms of new centuries. While some believe, that old building could be harmful for entirely local society, provoking physical injures, other suggest that many of them could be also hazardous for the whole environment, because they seem to not be ecological-friendly. Consequently, to give an example, we now can witness modern edifices from steel, concrete and glass, as well as houses, which are almost not harmful for the natural world, developing more and more ideas how to do our residential areas closer to the environment. These instances have bolstered existed ideas and opinions, why it is better to make money investments into a new building, rather than eldest.
On the other hand,despite the minor benefits of development new settings, the idea that we only waste money of conservation old one is completely preposterous. we would have never known about our ancestors and how they suppose to live if we had never seen all countries treasures and their history. It is important to leave a footprint as well as the world heritage for our future generation. Indeed, to give an example, which even everyone know about, there was a huge fire in Paris and to this reason the significant part of Notre Dam was incinerated. However, there is already a vast amount of money that is given by charities and authorities to reconstruct the pearl of the city. Overall, the idea of preservation and renovating old settings is greatly outweighed one, which is against it, because without these buildings it will mean that we do not have the history at all and nothing had done on the planet.
To sum up, this essay argued that people, who think it is more profitably to invest money into construction of new settings, are narrow-minded and underestimate the effects of ignoring eldest. In my opinion, communities should make a greater effort to try to save our history, to prevent future cities being the same, all from glass, steel and iron, and this is why I believe that total expenditures in only modern construction is completely inappropriate way of building our future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-12 | johntoanpro | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-22 | TranMinhDuc | 83 | view |
| 2021-09-13 | jasu | 75 | view |
| 2021-04-04 | sandhu harman | 73 | view |
| 2020-08-26 | prem jariwala | 78 | view |
- construct new buildings rather than wasting money on maintaining old ones 79
- The pie charts below compare the hours worked by employees and self-employed homeworkers in 2014 in the UK. 78
- household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia 78
- Investment in local amenities such as leisure centres is the best way for the government to foster a good community spirit 66
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 237, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...ld new settings instead of simple waste governments money on maintaining old buildings. Thi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 18, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , despite
...han eldest. On the other hand,despite the minor benefits of development new s...
^^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 161, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...ion old one is completely preposterous. we would have never known about our ancest...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, so, well, while, as well as, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2183.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 422.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17298578199 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96373129623 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552132701422 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 684.0 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.0389141487 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.533333333 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1333333333 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268357204004 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0813230515827 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867119385096 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153578291841 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446181544365 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.