Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarkets in some countries, many small, local businesses are unable to compete. Some people think that the closure of local business will bring about the death of local communities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, local convenience stores and enterprises are inevitably disappearing because of spreading of supermarkets in a fast pace and disability of small shops and ventures to stand the competition. There is an opinion that this trend will lead to disappearance of local communities. I totally disagree with this point of view; in fact, it may even improve the quality of life of a neighborhood.
First, huge supermarkets not only provide necessary products, at the same moment they are accumulating entertainment facilities such as movie, restaurants, and children’s playgrounds, bowling. Thus, a supermarket plays role of a community center where local people may spend their spare time and communicate with each other. In addition, it is convenient to purchase everything needed from clothes to chemicals in one place. Consequently, supermarkets have positive influence on lives of neighbourhood.
Additionally, modern people does not depend on closeness of a local store due to means of transport. It means that closeness of local store is not important for the community in terms of consumption. What is important that due to commodity circulation, prices for common products as rule are cheaper in huge stores rather than in small convenient stores, as well as they have discounts on certain types of goods. All these factors made purchase in large shops quite appealing and convenient.
In conclusion, I totally disagree that disappearance of local shops means death of a local community. In a contrast, I am convinced that neighbourhood will receive only positive outcome because huge supermarkets provide large variety of products as well as service and entertainment facilities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-14 | Mariamirabella | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-11 | shivangi patel | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-05 | Bilal-88 | 11 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | Mikhael | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | Mikhael | 56 | view |
- Some people think that it is better to build more public parks and sports facilities in new towns rather than shopping malls To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- Many families move to different countries Some people think children can benefit from this while others consider it is hard for children if families move to a foreign country Discuss both views and your opinion 78
- Your colleague loaned you a book to use in a presentation at work Write to your friend to say What the presentation was about Why it was important How the book helped you 56
- Many criminals commit further crimes as soon as they released from prison What do you think are the causes of this What possible solutions can you suggest 70
- People nowadays are used to disposable items meaning that they use things for short time and throw them away What do you think is the cause of this and what problems can it lead to 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s service and entertainment facilities.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, may, thus, well, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54961832061 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33329157171 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580152671756 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2448297229 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.846153846 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1538461538 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199135052662 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723045159701 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635425988092 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121265566386 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0253609043872 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.