The diagrams below show the water supply system in Australia at present and in future. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features.
The map compares the water supply system in Australia between the present and the future.
Overall, while the waste water is directly discharged into the river from the water treatment plant in the present, it will be treated in the water treatment plant for recycling in the future. Besides, in the present system, the storm water flows from the city into the river compared with its process in the water treatment factory for use in the future plan.
In the present system, the water is supplied by the dam and storage to users in the city, and then the cleaning process of the waste water is taken place in the water treatment plant before being discharged into the river. In addition, the storm water is led directly to the river.
In the future plan, the dam and storage will still be considered as water provider for similar users, including households, factories and shops in the city. However, while the waste water is removed after treating in the water treatment plant in the present, it will be recycled in the future. Besides, the city will use the storm water as water following the treatment without discharging into the river like the present.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-14 | nguyenduchuy2705 | 67 | view |
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world What are the reasons for this and how can people learn more about the natural world 84
- the diagram below show how sand dunes are formed 61
- Many people are now spending more and more time travelling to work or school Some people believe that this is a negative development while others think there are some benefits Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- More and more people in the city live in homes with small spaces or no outdoor areas Do you think it is a negative or positive development 89
- Some people believe that all wild animals should be protected Others say that only a few wild animals should be protected Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... water is led directly to the river. In the future plan, the dam and storage wi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, still, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 964.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7960199005 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30245617182 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.407960199005 0.547539520022 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7493718553 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.5 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211160823477 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136124254815 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0886189191255 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196827539791 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0847695669987 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.