The table below gives information about the amount of beef exported in five different countries in 2012, 2014 and 2016.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table represents data about beef exports of five countries in the years 2012, 2014 and 2016.
Overall, it is evident that Brazil and Uruguay were the clear market leaders throughout the period. However, Japan experienced the most remarkable rise in beef exports.
Looking at the table more closely, one can see that Brazil's beef exports grew from 125 thousand to 137 thousand tonnes within four years, keeping its leading position among the five countries. Maintaining its second place, Uruguay saw the amount of beef shipped to other countries dip to under 40 thousand tonnes in 2014, before rebounding two years later.
With a nearly fivefold increase, Japan witnessed the most dramatic increase in its beef export quantities, reaching a peak of over 1000 tonnes in 2016. Similar to Uruguay, Switzerland saw a slight reduction in its beef exports, recording only 17 tonnes in 2014, before rising to 22 tonnes in 2016. The opposite trend was experienced by Norway: beef exports surged to 81 tonnes in 2014, before decreasing substantially to a mere 17 tonnes at the end of the period.
- The graph below shows the average number of Vietnamese students studying in France, Russia and America between 2000 and 2015. 73
- The table shows the amount of money given to developing countries by the USA, EU countries and other countries from 2006 to 2010 (Figures are in millions of dollars) 73
- “We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own; disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.”Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with 80
- The chart shows the annual GDP growth rates in 3 countries from 2007 to 2010. 89
- The table below shows the results of a 20 year study into why adults in the UK attend arts events Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, second
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 924.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10497237569 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56301194874 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613259668508 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6781977287 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.5 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185365326588 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0967948037587 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101992218818 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148580857072 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125056652593 0.0819641961636 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.