Positive And Negative Effects Of Technology Information Through Mass Media

Essay topics:

Positive And Negative Effects Of Technology Information Through Mass Media

The importance of technology information through mass media, which has always been debatable, has now upsurge a lot of arguments in favor and against it, thus is has become more controversial. The substantial influence imitating celebrities has sparked the controversy over the potential this trend an integral part of society in recent years. It can be upside imitating celebrities are instrumental indeed, however it has some various drawbacks as well. The essay will be elaborate both assertion and will provide a well-weighted conclusion.

At the outset, there are numerous reason of top is unresverdly salient, but most conspicuous one lie in the fact mass media provide the worldwide news and information easily and second is communicating with globalization then we can talk with the person in any country that advantage. Therefore, it is vital time to appreciate both the significance of the topic for the amelioration of society.

However, it has some people who choose to think differently substantial influence on the topic? Nevertheless, the contradiction is rooted in the fact sometime mass media provide fake news to public and second is children have a also negative because sometime under eighteen children got sexual video from mass media that disadvantages. Hence, it is apparent the downside of the topic cannot be overlooked.

The above-presented dissertation illustrates both perspective about the impact of the topic. While it is evident that it has various benefits, although its deleterious effects cannot be ignored.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-02-03 topraveesh 88 view
2023-09-27 mohammadsabet 77 view
2023-01-16 woutan 88 view
2023-01-16 woutan 77 view
2022-04-08 amolsharma44 80 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Gurjantsingh :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'upsurged'.
Suggestion: upsurged
...hich has always been debatable, has now upsurge a lot of arguments in favor and against...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 227, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...s to public and second is children have a also negative because sometime under ei...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, second, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1308.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 240.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20296900027 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629166666667 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.6666804408 50.4703680194 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.909090909 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8181818182 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.81818181818 7.25397266985 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21318492593 0.242375264174 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0534380202597 0.0925447433944 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833248860109 0.071462118173 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10086533007 0.151781067708 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386356209729 0.0609392437508 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.