It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.
The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny eventually be diminished.
For some people, they may be that owing to the fact that media are interesting in destroy celebrities’ fame to receive concern from the public, living heroes or heroines no longer survive in nowadays societies. The word ‘’ hero’’ and ‘’heroine’’ are quite obscure which need a more specific definition, but even if they are defined as icons in specific fields, my agreement with it is still with qualifications.
First of all, why the word ‘’ hero’’ and ‘’heroine’’ are too oversimplified is because we are all just people. People who do good things and bad things. Asking one to be a hero or heroine who never do something wrong is just raising moral standards to a impossible height, and this is nothing but toxic.For example, should we neglect the well known Hollywood celebrity Leonardo Dicaprio's effort in rescuing the environment because he is also famous for sleeping with a dozens of actresses? If these’’ hero’’ and ‘'heroine’’ actually mean people who devote and make great change, then it is clearer and may be possible.
Admittedly, it is not new news that media love to use the negative informations of well-esteemed icons to diminish their fame. This is especially commonplace in politics. Medias who are tilted to a party would be especially interested in do so to destroy the influence of parties they are against. President Tsai’s dissertation at LSE is therefore scrutinized to destroy her achievement in foreign affairs. However, this phenomenon may not be so common in other fields, which implicated that such prevalence in politics may be an exception.
Outside the chaotic political field, the connection between media and public icons are comparatively harmonious. The media would not be so insane in digging out those celebrities’ history wither because the public don’t have that much interest in the gossips or the media may rely on good connections with these people to get exclusive news. Jane Godder may be a good example for this statement. Devoting in chimp conservation, the physical anthropologist is can be counted as one of the most important lady in academia. Reporters cray on revealing her past may receive public outrage as harassing the innocent elder, and may have difficulties to get permission for reporting her pint of view on primate conservation. These reasons may help her reputation at bay from being destroyed.
All in all, the word ‘’ hero’’ and ‘’heroine’’ in the passage is too generalized which need a clearer definition. However, except from political field, I still believe that this argument is not tenable because the public won’t buy the behavior of badgering the reverenced and the media also don’t have other reasons to do so.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-17 | smithsonite79 | 79 | view |
- Traffic here in Waymarsh is becoming a problem. Although just three years ago a state traffic survey showed that the typical driving commuter took 20 minutes to get to work, the commute now takes closer to 40 minutes, according to the survey just complete 69
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of a food distribution company with food storage warehouses in several cities.Recently, we signed a contract with the Fly-Away Pest Control Company to provide pest control services at our fast-food 69
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the Wextent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 66
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants.Butter has now been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. Only abouWt 2 percent of customers have filed 72
- It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero. The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny eventually be diminished. 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 68, Rule ID: BE_INTEREST_IN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'interested'?
Suggestion: interested
...e that owing to the fact that media are interesting in destroy celebrities' fame to re...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 194, Rule ID: IN_NOWADAYS[1]
Message: nowadays is used without 'in'. Use simply: 'nowadays'.
Suggestion: nowadays
...ng heroes or heroines no longer survive in nowadays societies. The word '' hero&a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 409, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... defined as icons in specific fields, my agreement with it is still with qualific...
^^
Line 3, column 293, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...rong is just raising moral standards to a impossible height, and this is nothing ...
^
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...e height, and this is nothing but toxic.For example, should we neglect the well kn...
^^^
Line 3, column 363, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is nothing but toxic.For example, should we neglect the well known Hollywood cele...
^^
Line 3, column 509, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a dozen' or simply 'dozens'?
Suggestion: a dozen; dozens
...use he is also famous for sleeping with a dozens of actresses? If these'' her...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, may, so, still, then, therefore, well, for example, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2434.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 445.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46966292135 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.97231677908 2.79657885939 142% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543820224719 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 765.9 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.1328647692 60.3974514979 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.105263158 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4210526316 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52631578947 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100274629292 0.243740707755 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475398394351 0.0831039109588 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426958148615 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0698723226582 0.150359130593 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269166642438 0.0667264976115 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.1392134831 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 100.480337079 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.