In some countries children have very strict rules of behavior, in other countries they are allowed to do almost anything they want. To what extent should children have to follow rules?
It is true that incredibly rigorous regulations regarding the etiquette of children have applied in a number of nations, while children are encouraged to make virtual things they are fond of in other states. As far as I concerned, these stringent rules have both great benefits and detrimental demerits.
On the one hand, it is unable to deny the fact that individuals and the society world reap certain benefits when it comes to using hostile regulations of behavior on children owing to these regulations maybe create a sense of responsibility and respectful children who are the prospective key of a country and in turn, mature into deferential to adults. Therefore, putting a code of conduct into practice results in shaping a stable community regardless of youngsters come from different strata, which is virtually immune from kinds of crimes related to misconduct such as humiliating behaviors and outrage. Without these rigorous rules, children would not obey their parents, teachers and hence, they would get out of hand and ignore their obligations imposed by parenthood and their society. These future citizens become indolence and irresponsibility to themselves, their family and motherland, which means they make a heavy burden to the government as well as the community where they are residing.
On the other hand, despite the vivid profits mentioned above, however, drawbacks of these rules should not be ignored. Firstly, most of the offenders having behaviors and wrongdoings against the interests of the community are the consequences of excessively inflexible education methods relying on such laws. This could be demonstrated by the rising number of juvenile delinquents, especially crimes in terms of violent acts, are due to the contents of such rules applying at schools and families sometimes consist of inflicting corporal punishment on children. Such rules encourage and show children that violence is an acceptable way to deal with problems. Not to mention that making use of rigorous laws of behavior to treat children not only forms a sedentary lifestyle but also limits their creativity. That is the reason why in a number of international communities, combinations between using strict regulations of etiquette on children and letting them do something they want as long as their parents could observe them.
In conclusion, it seems to me that simultaneously the advantages of putting strict rules of behavior into practice on youngsters, its negative effects are unavoidable. Hence, the limitation its drawbacks of such rules should be taken into consideration by their parents, society and the state.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-18 | Harrynguyen1980 | 67 | view |
| 2019-06-24 | santhosh666 | 61 | view |
| 2019-06-23 | santhosh666 | 56 | view |
| 2019-02-13 | dazzle | 73 | view |
- Some people think that planning for the future is a waste of time They believe it is more important to focus on the present To what extent agree disagree 84
- Men do most of the high-level jobs. Should governments encourage a certain rate of these jobs to be for women? 84
- Nowadays, the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? 89
- Some businesses find that their new employees lack basic interpersonal skills such as cooperative skills What are the causes and suggest possible solutions 89
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.Discuss both these views a 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 41.998997996 164% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2228.0 1615.20841683 138% => OK
No of words: 414.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38164251208 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99859551556 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 698.4 506.74238477 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.3194776064 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.142857143 106.682146367 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5714285714 20.7667163134 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1428571429 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290577666379 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934324001414 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402206864001 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175639081895 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567520138661 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.52 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 9.78957915832 199% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.7795591182 186% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.