Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
I definitely agree with the statement that in future there will be a lot less cars than there are today. In fact, I believe that cars would be obsolete in future. Everyone will be traveling via air transportation or even teleportation if the technology becomes advanced enough.
First of all, the transportation industry is developing very rapidly. There are already so many better, faster and safer alternatives to cars such as airways, railways, ropeways, sea routes, etc. One can only imagine what the future of transportation will be like 20 years from today. Air travel and railways are considered an ideal and safer way of traveling today. For instance, most of the people in my city prefer railways over cars. People believe that it is easier and cheaper to travel in a train rather than a car. One can relax in a train without worrying about driving or maintenance of the car or filling gas in the car.
The second reason that i believe cars will be replaced by something else is because cars are a waste of resources in compared to trains or buses. They consume similar amount of fuel but can only support very few people. This means they create more pollution and increase traffic on roads. Sure people love the freedom of owning and traveling in a car. But people are already conscious about the environment and how use of large numbers of cars is increasing pollution. In country like japan, we frequently hear news about how people are using public transportation and trying to decrease the number of cars on the street. Also, large numbers of cars means large number of possible reckless drivers who might cause road accidents. So people will be better off using public transportation in place of cars and i am of the opinion that slowly people are understanding this and considering to option out of owning their personal cars.
In conclusion, I personally believe that owning a car is a nuisance and they will be completely replaced with public transportation or air transportation very soon in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | King harald | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | mucahit11 | 63 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | thonsapon83 | 90 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | nusybah | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | jason_linnil | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at young age. Use specific masons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Toefls ibt test1 Writing Integrated 1 68
- Altruism is a type of behavior in which an animal sacrifices its own interest for that of another animal or group of animals Altruism is the opposite of selfishness individuals performing altruistic acts gain nothing for themselves Examples of altruism ab 87
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. 70
- Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school.Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
..., I believe that cars would be obsolete in future. Everyone will be traveling via air tra...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 24, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...in the car. The second reason that i believe cars will be replaced by someth...
^
Line 9, column 809, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...lic transportation in place of cars and i am of the opinion that slowly people ar...
^
Line 9, column 848, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... i am of the opinion that slowly people are understanding this and considering to option out of o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1691.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 347.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87319884726 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78681652957 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521613832853 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1690702785 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2631578947 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.89473684211 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253692379981 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083054303744 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0904740246601 0.0737576698707 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178982817174 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0779845513381 0.0645574589148 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.